League One·
Regular Season - 23·12/29/2025·14:45
Blackpool
Blackpool
WWDWW
4-0
Finished
HT2-0
Rotherham
Rotherham
LLLLW
📍 Bloomfield Road, Blackpool
Season statsLeague One
Blackpool22matchesRotherham22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League One.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
66%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

34%
1472
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1435
55%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

50%
77%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

18%
3.04
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.04

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
1.18
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.09
32%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

27%
23%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

27%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

45%
18%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%
36%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

32%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
1.14
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
64%
Scored > 0.566%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

68%
68%
Over 1.566%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

64%
41%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%
27%
Over 3.523%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
45%
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

9%
23%
Scored Both Halves16%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

9%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
1.36
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.32
14.59
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.09
4.32
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.68
2.82
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.33
21/22
65%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

68%
18%
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
1.98
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.07
1.65
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.77
0.33
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.29
-0.40
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.61
0.17
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.20

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
10.05
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.45
3.45
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

2.86
6.82
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.95
68%
Box Shot %65%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
34%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

30%
11%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
48%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

45%
72%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

68%
368.68
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

318.82
0.00
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
27%6/22
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

32%7/22
45%10/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

23%5/22
27%6/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

45%10/22
32%7/22
HT/FT Same Outcome43%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

55%12/22
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won46%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

43%3/7
33%2/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered32%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

30%3/10

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
17%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
22%
16-30'18%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

14%
9%
31-45'13%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
13%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

18%
9%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
30%
76-90+'27%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
36%8/22
Scored First42%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

48%10/21
64%14/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

52%11/21
63%5/8
Win when Scoring First56%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%5/10
14%2/14
Win when Conceding First12%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

9%1/11
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

34'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
32%7/22
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

23%5/22
27%6/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%6/22
71%5/7
Lead Saved after 75'67%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

63%5/8
29%2/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

38%3/8
5%1/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
100%23/23
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%19/22
0%0/23
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%2/22
0%0/23
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%1/22
13%4/32
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/29
6%2/32
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
3.55
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.59
5.09
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.00
41%
Corner Share44%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

48%
-1.32
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.25
50%11/22
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

64%14/22
45%10/22
Match Corners > 9.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

45%10/22
32%7/22
Match Corners > 10.530%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

27%6/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.05
5%1/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/22
11.86
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.32
78%14/18
Match Cards > 3.574%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

70%14/20
18/2220/22
50%9/18
Match Cards > 4.553%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

55%11/20
18/2220/22
58%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

54%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBlackpool at home · Rotherham on the road
1111
1.45
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.73
36%4/11
Win Rate27%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
27%3/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

64%7/11
1.45
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.64
1.55
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.27
18%2/11
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

18%2/11
64%7/11
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%5/11
55%6/11
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
2.30
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.66
1.60
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.56