Championship·
Regular Season - 36·03/08/2026·12:30
QPR
QPR
LLWLD
0-4
Finished
HT0-1
Middlesbrough
Middlesbrough
WDDLW
📍 Loftus Road, London
Season statsChampionship
QPR35matchesMiddlesbrough35matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Championship.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
43%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

61%
1426
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1522
47%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

63%
38%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

59%
2.98
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.59

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3535
1.34
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.89
37%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

54%
23%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

26%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%
26%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%
23%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

23%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3535
1.31
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.54
77%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

77%
74%
Over 1.573%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

71%
63%
Over 2.559%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

54%
37%
Over 3.531%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
66%
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%
26%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

34%
23%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3535
1.54
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
11.66
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.37
3.80
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.34
2.29
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.34
34/35
59%
Save %64%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
26%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3535
1.09
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.38
1.15
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.90
-0.06
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.48
0.12
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.24
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3535
12.74
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.74
3.89
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.54
8.11
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.03
64%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
30%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3535
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

58%
75%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
367.03
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

498.86
-0.09
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.20

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3535
26%9/35
Leading at HT31%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

37%13/35
40%14/35
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

29%10/35
34%12/35
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

34%12/35
60%21/35
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

69%24/35
78%7/9
Led at HT → Won89%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%13/13
25%3/12
Trailed at HT → Recovered38%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%6/12

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 35/3535/353535
12%
0-15'10%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
7%
16-30'10%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
21%
31-45'23%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

25%
7%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
21%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
33%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

19%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 35/3535/353535
30%9/30
Scored First38%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

47%15/32
70%21/30
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

53%17/32
89%8/9
Win when Scoring First94%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%15/15
24%5/21
Win when Conceding First24%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

24%4/17
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

27'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 35/3535/353535
37%13/35
Scored after 75'31%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

26%9/35
14%5/35
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%6/35
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%16/16
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/16
0%0/35
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/35

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 35/3535/353535
95%41/43
Open-Play Share97%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

98%51/52
2%1/43
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/52
2%1/43
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/52
0%0/57
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%2/37
7%4/57
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%3/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3535
4.97
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.09
5.09
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.43
49%
Corner Share54%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

58%
0.06
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.63
69%24/35
Match Corners > 8.567%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

66%23/35
51%18/35
Match Corners > 9.551%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

51%18/35
37%13/35
Match Corners > 10.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

46%16/35

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 35/3535/353535
1.66
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.60
3%1/35
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

3%1/35
10.77
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.71
67%18/27
Match Cards > 3.576%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

85%22/26
27/3526/35
41%11/27
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%13/26
27/3526/35
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeQPR at home · Middlesbrough on the road
1718
1.53
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.72
47%8/17
Win Rate49%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%9/18
41%7/17
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

28%5/18
1.71
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.56
1.53
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.28
18%3/17
Clean Sheet14%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%2/18
76%13/17
BTTS72%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%12/18
76%13/17
Over 2.569%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

61%11/18
1.42
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.22
0.97
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.98