Championship·
Regular Season - 29·01/24/2026·10:00
QPR
QPR
DDDWL
2-3
Finished
HT1-0
Wrexham
Wrexham
DLDWW
📍 Loftus Road, London
Season statsChampionship
QPR28matchesWrexham28matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Championship.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
53%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

55%
1450
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1532
53%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

58%
53%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

51%
1.90
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.29

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2828
1.43
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.46
39%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

36%
25%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

39%
36%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%
29%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%
18%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

14%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2828
1.36
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.43
82%
Scored > 0.584%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

86%
71%
Over 1.577%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

82%
61%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

43%
32%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

25%
68%
BTTS68%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

68%
25%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

18%
21%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

21%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2828
1.39
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
11.61
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.54
3.54
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.50
2.15
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.37
27/2827/28
59%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
29%
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2828
1.02
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.46
1.10
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.36
-0.08
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.10
0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.17
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2828
12.50
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.29
3.79
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.75
8.04
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.71
64%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
30%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
11%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2828
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

47%
75%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

77%
363.11
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

399.11
-0.12
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2828
29%8/28
Leading at HT32%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

36%10/28
39%11/28
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

32%9/28
32%9/28
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

32%9/28
61%17/28
HT/FT Same Outcome50%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

39%11/28
88%7/8
Led at HT → Won64%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

40%4/10
33%3/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%6/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 28/2828/282828
11%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
8%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
22%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

13%
8%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

23%
19%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
31%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 28/2828/282828
33%8/24
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

62%16/26
67%16/24
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

38%10/26
100%8/8
Win when Scoring First72%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

44%7/16
19%3/16
Win when Conceding First24%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

30%3/10
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

30'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

21'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 28/2828/282828
39%11/28
Scored after 75'36%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%9/28
14%4/28
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

39%11/28
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'77%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

54%7/13
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

46%6/13
0%0/28
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/28

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 28/2828/282828
94%34/36
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%35/39
3%1/36
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%3/39
3%1/36
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/39
0%0/41
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/37
7%3/41
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%3/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2828
4.82
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.46
5.18
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.54
48%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
-1.12
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.52
64%18/28
Match Corners > 8.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

61%17/28
46%13/28
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

54%15/28
36%10/28
Match Corners > 10.534%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

32%9/28

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 28/2828/282828
1.71
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.61
0%0/28
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/28
10.82
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.39
62%13/21
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

64%14/22
21/2822/28
48%10/21
Match Cards > 4.544%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

41%9/22
21/2822/28
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeQPR at home · Wrexham on the road
1313
1.77
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.31
54%7/13
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

31%4/13
31%4/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%4/13
1.85
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.08
1.31
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
23%3/13
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

31%4/13
77%10/13
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

54%7/13
77%10/13
Over 2.554%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

31%4/13
1.46
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.03
0.99
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.56