League Two·
Regular Season - 43·04/11/2026·10:00
Barnet
Barnet
WDWWD
3-2
Finished
HT1-1
Barrow
Barrow
LDWLL
📍 The Hive Stadium, London
Season statsLeague Two
Barnet42matchesBarrow41matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
68%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

45%
1464
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1339
61%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

35%
75%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

54%
3.30
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.10

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
4241
1.52
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.80
40%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

20%
31%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
29%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

59%
36%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%
21%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

39%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
4241
1.36
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.93
79%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

61%
74%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
43%
Over 2.551%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

59%
29%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

29%
52%
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

54%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

12%
24%
Scored Both Halves20%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

17%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
4241
1.12
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.59
9.95
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.59
3.43
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.85
2.26
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.27
66%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
36%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
4241
1.33
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.85
1.34
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.43
-0.00
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.58
0.25
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.05
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.08

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
4241
13.62
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.34
4.45
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.10
9.02
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.07
66%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
33%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

30%
10%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
4241
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

46%
67%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

67%
380.45
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

334.88
0.09
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.06

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
4241
31%13/42
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

17%7/41
48%20/42
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

46%19/41
21%9/42
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

37%15/41
55%23/42
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%23/41
62%8/13
Led at HT → Won66%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
22%2/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered21%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%3/15

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 42/4241/414241
13%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
12%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
22%
31-45'25%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

28%
15%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

15%
10%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

15%
28%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 42/4241/414241
61%23/38
Scored First46%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

32%12/37
39%15/38
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

68%25/37
61%14/23
Win when Scoring First60%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

58%7/12
20%3/15
Win when Conceding First12%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

4%1/25
37'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

28'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 42/4241/414241
31%13/42
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%8/41
19%8/42
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

39%16/41
77%10/13
Lead Saved after 75'70%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

64%7/11
23%3/13
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

36%4/11
0%0/42
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/41

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 42/4241/414241
85%51/60
Open-Play Share88%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%36/40
10%6/60
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

3%1/40
5%3/60
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%3/40
9%4/44
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%2/63
0%0/44
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

2%1/63

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
4241
6.81
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.20
3.36
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.61
67%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

43%
2.71
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.42
69%29/42
Match Corners > 8.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%26/41
55%23/42
Match Corners > 9.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

59%24/41
36%15/42
Match Corners > 10.537%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

39%16/41

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 42/4241/414241
1.60
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.90
12%5/42
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%5/41
11.29
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.83
74%23/31
Match Cards > 3.570%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

66%21/32
31/4232/41
65%20/31
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%14/32
31/4232/41
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBarnet at home · Barrow on the road
2121
1.43
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.81
38%8/21
Win Rate29%

Share of sampled matches won.

19%4/21
33%7/21
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

57%12/21
1.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.19
1.19
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.81
33%7/21
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%3/21
57%12/21
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%15/21
52%11/21
Over 2.564%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

76%16/21
1.58
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.26
1.29
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.66