League Two·
Regular Season - 34·02/21/2026·10:00
Gillingham
Gillingham
LLWLL
0-3
Finished
HT0-2
Oldham
Oldham
WDLLL
📍 Priestfield Stadium, Gillingham
Season statsLeague Two
Gillingham31matchesOldham30matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
42%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

50%
1368
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1371
44%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

54%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

45%
2.18
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.71

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3130
1.32
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.30
32%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

30%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

40%
32%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%
23%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

37%
23%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

37%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3130
1.29
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.03
77%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

63%
65%
Over 1.562%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

60%
42%
Over 2.541%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%
29%
Over 3.523%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

17%
58%
BTTS51%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

43%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
16%
Scored Both Halves18%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

20%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3130
1.23
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
12.81
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.50
3.84
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.63
2.48
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.63
65%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
23%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

37%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3130
1.34
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.64
1.65
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.61
-0.31
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.04
-0.20
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.41
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3130
13.58
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.43
4.39
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.33
9.42
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.90
69%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
32%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
10%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3130
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
62%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

64%
298.13
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

312.70
-0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.07

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3130
19%6/31
Leading at HT18%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

17%5/30
52%16/31
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

47%14/30
29%9/31
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

37%11/30
48%15/31
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

67%20/30
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%5/5
33%3/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered35%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

36%4/11

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 31/3130/303130
5%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
13%
16-30'10%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

6%
16%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
24%
46-60'24%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

24%
13%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
29%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 31/3130/303130
40%12/30
Scored First42%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

44%11/25
60%18/30
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

56%14/25
67%8/12
Win when Scoring First70%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
11%2/18
Win when Conceding First9%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

7%1/14
47'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

28'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

27'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 31/3130/303130
29%9/31
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%6/30
29%9/31
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%4/30
80%8/10
Lead Saved after 75'79%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

78%7/9
20%2/10
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

22%2/9
0%0/31
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/30

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 31/3130/303130
76%29/38
Open-Play Share82%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%29/33
21%8/38
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%2/33
3%1/38
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%2/33
5%2/40
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%4/28
8%3/40
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/28

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3130
5.23
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.40
4.48
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.87
54%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

53%
0.70
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.29
58%18/31
Match Corners > 8.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

70%21/30
48%15/31
Match Corners > 9.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

63%19/30
35%11/31
Match Corners > 10.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%15/30

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 31/3130/303130
2.39
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.97
6%2/31
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

10%3/30
13.03
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.97
81%22/27
Match Cards > 3.581%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

81%21/26
27/3126/30
52%14/27
Match Cards > 4.547%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

42%11/26
27/3126/30
72%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGillingham at home · Oldham on the road
1514
1.60
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.21
40%6/15
Win Rate34%

Share of sampled matches won.

29%4/14
20%3/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%5/14
1.47
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.93
1.27
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.07
20%3/15
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%6/14
73%11/15
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

36%5/14
47%7/15
Over 2.545%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

43%6/14
1.77
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.55
1.87
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.55