League Two·
Regular Season - 27·01/17/2026·10:00
Grimsby
Grimsby
WWWDL
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
Barnet
Barnet
WWDLL
📍 Blundell Park, Cleethorpes
Season statsLeague Two
Grimsby24matchesBarnet24matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

62%
1445
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1466
54%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

57%
73%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

66%
2.09
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.57

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2424
1.42
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.46
38%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
29%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
33%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%
29%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%
25%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

21%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2424
1.46
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
75%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

79%
71%
Over 1.577%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

83%
46%
Over 2.544%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%
25%
Over 3.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

25%
50%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

8%
13%
Scored Both Halves17%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

21%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2424
1.25
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.08
9.29
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9.96
3.21
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.21
1.96
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.08
61%
Save %63%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

65%
29%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2424
1.91
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.92
1.50
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.42
0.41
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.49
-0.42
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.42
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2424
13.92
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.29
4.63
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.79
9.38
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.71
67%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
33%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2424
59%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

56%
71%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

68%
406.13
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

367.75
0.14
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2424
29%7/24
Leading at HT31%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%8/24
50%12/24
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

33%8/24
21%5/24
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%8/24
54%13/24
HT/FT Same Outcome56%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%14/24
71%5/7
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

63%5/8
20%1/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered23%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%2/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 24/2424/242424
17%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
17%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
17%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
11%
46-60'10%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

9%
17%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
22%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

29%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 24/2424/242424
57%13/23
Scored First58%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

59%13/22
43%10/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

41%9/22
54%7/13
Win when Scoring First58%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

62%8/13
20%2/10
Win when Conceding First16%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

11%1/9
37'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

30'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 24/2424/242424
25%6/24
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%8/24
21%5/24
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%4/24
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'80%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

75%6/8
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

25%2/8
0%0/24
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/24

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 24/2424/242424
83%30/36
Open-Play Share83%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

83%29/35
11%4/36
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%3/35
6%2/36
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

9%3/35
3%1/29
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/23
3%1/29
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2424
6.13
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

7.25
3.71
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.25
62%
Corner Share66%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

69%
2.76
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

3.84
63%15/24
Match Corners > 8.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%16/24
42%10/24
Match Corners > 9.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

54%13/24
33%8/24
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

38%9/24

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 24/2424/242424
1.58
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.63
4%1/24
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%2/24
11.71
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.96
89%17/19
Match Cards > 3.584%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%14/18
19/2418/24
58%11/19
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%9/18
19/2418/24
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGrimsby at home · Barnet on the road
1212
1.42
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.67
42%5/12
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

42%5/12
42%5/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%2/12
1.42
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.17
0.92
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.83
33%4/12
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%6/12
42%5/12
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

42%5/12
42%5/12
Over 2.533%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%3/12
2.25
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.58
1.48
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.31