Liga I·
Regular Season - 14·10/26/2025·14:30
FCSB
FCSB
LLWLW
4-0
Finished
HT2-0
Uta Arad
Uta Arad
LLDDD
📍 Arena Nationala, Bucharest
Season statsLiga I
FCSB13matchesArad13matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Liga I.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
47%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

33%
1512
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1468
49%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

48%
44%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

18%
2.14
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.60

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1313
1.00
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.23
23%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

23%
31%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

54%
46%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

23%
23%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

15%
15%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

23%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1313
1.15
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.23
85%
Scored > 0.581%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

77%
69%
Over 1.577%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

85%
46%
Over 2.546%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

46%
31%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

23%
62%
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

69%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

15%
23%
Scored Both Halves23%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

23%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1313
1.54
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.54
12.23
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.23
4.15
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.54
2.69
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.25
12/13
65%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
23%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

15%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1313
1.44
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.28
1.58
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.75
-0.14
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.47
-0.15
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.20
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1313
16.69
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.69
5.69
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.31
10.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.31
60%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
34%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
7%
Shot Conversion8%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1313
57%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

45%
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
452.31
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

348.92
0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1313
31%4/13
Leading at HT35%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

38%5/13
46%6/13
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

31%4/13
23%3/13
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

31%4/13
38%5/13
HT/FT Same Outcome42%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

46%6/13
25%1/4
Led at HT → Won33%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

40%2/5
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered42%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 13/1313/131313
12%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
6%
16-30'6%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
24%
31-45'32%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

40%
18%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

7%
12%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

7%
29%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

27%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 13/1313/131313
69%9/13
Scored First55%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

42%5/12
31%4/13
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

58%7/12
33%3/9
Win when Scoring First37%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

40%2/5
0%0/4
Win when Conceding First7%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

14%1/7
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
50'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

20'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 13/1313/131313
46%6/13
Scored after 75'31%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

15%2/13
38%5/13
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

15%2/13
50%2/4
Lead Saved after 75'58%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%2/3
50%2/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%1/3
0%0/13
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/13

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 13/1313/131313
53%9/17
Open-Play Share66%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

80%12/15
35%6/17
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

20%3/15
12%2/17
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/15
22%4/18
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

14%3/21
0%0/18
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

5%1/21

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1313
7.00
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.77
4.69
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.54
60%
Corner Share56%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

51%
1.08
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.31
69%9/13
Match Corners > 8.573%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

77%10/13
69%9/13
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

31%4/13
62%8/13
Match Corners > 10.542%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

23%3/13

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 13/1313/131313
2.38
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.92
8%1/13
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

15%2/13
11.92
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.62
67%8/12
Match Cards > 3.571%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

75%9/12
12/1312/13
42%5/12
Match Cards > 4.554%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

67%8/12
12/1312/13
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

57%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFCSB at home · Arad on the road
66
1.17
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
33%2/6
Win Rate25%

Share of sampled matches won.

17%1/6
50%3/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%2/6
0.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
33%2/6
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/6
33%2/6
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

83%5/6
17%1/6
Over 2.525%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%2/6
1.52
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.17
1.23
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.49