Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 30·04/19/2026·12:30
Plzen
Plzen
DDWWL
0-1
Finished
HT0-0
Pardubice
Pardubice
WWLWD
📍 Doosan Arena, Plzen
Season statsCzech Liga
Plzen28matchesPardubice28matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
61%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

59%
1745
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1496
60%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

58%
61%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

60%
2.43
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.27

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2828
1.79
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.25
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

32%
29%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

29%
21%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
36%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%
21%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

25%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2828
1.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
79%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

75%
82%
Over 1.586%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
54%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
25%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

29%
50%
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

68%
21%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

25%
43%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

14%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2828
1.18
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.61
11.50
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.75
4.25
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.64
3.14
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.89
74%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

62%
36%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2828
1.87
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.40
1.41
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.66
0.46
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.26
-0.27
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.12
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2828
16.43
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.32
5.96
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.32
10.04
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.07
61%
Box Shot %65%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

69%
36%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
11%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2828
56%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

46%
78%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
397.14
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

328.57
0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.06

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2828
54%15/28
Leading at HT36%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

18%5/28
25%7/28
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

46%13/28
21%6/28
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

36%10/28
79%22/28
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

43%12/28
80%12/15
Led at HT → Won70%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

60%3/5
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered28%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

40%4/10

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 28/2828/282828
10%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

9%
18%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

9%
22%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
16%
46-60'20%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

24%
14%
61-75'19%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

24%
20%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 28/2828/282828
73%19/26
Scored First55%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

37%10/27
27%7/26
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

63%17/27
68%13/19
Win when Scoring First69%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

70%7/10
14%1/7
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

12%2/17
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

34'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 28/2828/282828
29%8/28
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

21%6/28
29%8/28
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

39%11/28
86%12/14
Lead Saved after 75'82%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

78%7/9
14%2/14
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

22%2/9
0%0/28
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/28

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 28/2828/282828
92%46/50
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

85%29/34
6%3/50
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%3/34
2%1/50
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%2/34
9%3/32
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

9%4/46
0%0/32
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

7%3/46

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2828
5.71
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.43
3.82
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.36
60%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
1.88
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.26
57%16/28
Match Corners > 8.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

71%20/28
46%13/28
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

54%15/28
36%10/28
Match Corners > 10.534%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

32%9/28

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 28/2828/282828
2.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.29
4%1/28
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

21%6/28
12.18
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.18
90%18/20
Match Cards > 3.585%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

79%19/24
20/2824/28
80%16/20
Match Cards > 4.571%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

63%15/24
20/2824/28
62%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

73%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePlzen at home · Pardubice on the road
1414
1.86
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.29
50%7/14
Win Rate43%

Share of sampled matches won.

36%5/14
14%2/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%6/14
1.71
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
1.14
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.57
36%5/14
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%2/14
57%8/14
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

64%9/14
43%6/14
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%8/14
2.39
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.39
1.29
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.60