Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 29·04/12/2026·01:30 PM
Pardubice
Pardubice
WLWDL
2-1
Finished
HT1-1
Sigma Olomouc
Sigma Olomouc
LLDDW
📍 Stadion Arnosta Kostala, Pardubice
Season statsCzech Liga
Pardubice27matchesOlomouc27matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
55%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

42%
1485
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1491
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

51%
53%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

32%
2.08
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.94

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2727
1.19
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.48
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

41%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

26%
41%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
11%
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

37%
26%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

37%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2727
1.22
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.11
74%
Scored > 0.569%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

63%
89%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

52%
48%
Over 2.543%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

37%
30%
Over 3.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
67%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

37%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

15%
11%
Scored Both Halves11%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

11%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2727
1.63
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.07
12.52
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.37
4.67
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.67
2.89
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.65
26/27
62%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
11%
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

37%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2727
1.41
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.28
1.48
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.45
-0.06
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.17
-0.20
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.01
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2727
10.44
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.44
3.30
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.37
7.15
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.48
68%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
32%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
12%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2727
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
74%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
331.19
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

345.48
-0.05
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2727
19%5/27
Leading at HT22%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

26%7/27
44%12/27
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%14/27
37%10/27
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%6/27
44%12/27
HT/FT Same Outcome52%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

59%16/27
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won73%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
40%4/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered28%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

17%1/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 27/2727/272727
9%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
9%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
16%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

20%
25%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

7%
22%
61-75'21%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

20%
19%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 27/2727/272727
38%10/26
Scored First44%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%12/24
62%16/26
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%12/24
70%7/10
Win when Scoring First81%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

92%11/12
6%1/16
Win when Conceding First3%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/12
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

43'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 27/2727/272727
22%6/27
Scored after 75'26%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%8/27
41%11/27
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%6/27
75%6/8
Lead Saved after 75'88%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%6/6
25%2/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/6
0%0/27
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/27

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 27/2727/272727
88%28/32
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%28/30
6%2/32
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%2/30
6%2/32
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/30
9%4/45
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%2/29
7%3/45
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2727
4.48
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.89
5.33
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.74
46%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

51%
-0.02
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.10
70%19/27
Match Corners > 8.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

56%15/27
56%15/27
Match Corners > 9.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

52%14/27
33%9/27
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

37%10/27

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 27/2727/272727
2.30
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.19
22%6/27
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%3/27
14.07
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.22
78%18/23
Match Cards > 3.572%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%16/24
23/2724/27
65%15/23
Match Cards > 4.562%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

58%14/24
23/2724/27
73%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

67%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePardubice at home · Olomouc on the road
1313
1.08
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.15
23%3/13
Win Rate27%

Share of sampled matches won.

31%4/13
38%5/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

46%6/13
0.92
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.15
1.69
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.46
8%1/13
Clean Sheet8%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%1/13
69%9/13
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

46%6/13
38%5/13
Over 2.542%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

46%6/13
1.38
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.31
1.69
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.92