Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 27·04/25/2026·10:00
FK Jablonec
FK Jablonec
WLWWL
1-2
Finished
HT0-1
Slovan Liberec
Slovan Liberec
DLWDD
📍 Stadion Strelnice, Jablonec nad Nisou
Season statsCzech Liga
Jablonec29matchesLiberec29matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
56%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

49%
1658
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1619
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
57%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

45%
2.98
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.81

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2929
1.76
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.48
52%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

34%
28%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

28%
48%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%
21%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

28%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2929
1.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.41
79%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

72%
72%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

72%
34%
Over 2.536%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

38%
21%
Over 3.522%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

24%
38%
BTTS41%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
28%
Scored Both Halves29%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

31%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2929
1.07
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
12.72
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.10
3.48
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.72
2.61
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.69
28/29
72%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

72%
48%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2929
1.52
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.58
1.24
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.96
0.28
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.61
-0.05
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.37
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2929
11.34
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.72
3.86
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.72
8.14
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.48
72%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

55%
34%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
12%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2929
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
368.93
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

316.69
-0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2929
48%14/29
Leading at HT36%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

24%7/29
31%9/29
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%15/29
21%6/29
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

24%7/29
69%20/29
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

59%17/29
86%12/14
Led at HT → Won86%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

86%6/7
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered30%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

43%3/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 29/2929/292929
10%
0-15'10%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
24%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
22%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
17%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

12%
7%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
20%
76-90+'24%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

29%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 29/2929/292929
63%17/27
Scored First55%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

46%12/26
37%10/27
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

54%14/26
88%15/17
Win when Scoring First82%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

75%9/12
0%0/10
Win when Conceding First7%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

14%2/14
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 29/2929/292929
21%6/29
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%11/29
14%4/29
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%5/29
93%14/15
Lead Saved after 75'86%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

78%7/9
7%1/15
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

22%2/9
0%0/29
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/29

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 29/2929/292929
90%37/41
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

93%38/41
7%3/41
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

5%2/41
2%1/41
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/41
7%2/30
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%3/29
0%0/30
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2929
5.14
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.86
5.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.79
51%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
0.80
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.68
59%17/29
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

55%16/29
55%16/29
Match Corners > 9.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

41%12/29
45%13/29
Match Corners > 10.536%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

28%8/29

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 29/2929/292929
1.72
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.34
3%1/29
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

14%4/29
12.90
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.48
75%18/24
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

81%22/27
24/2927/29
46%11/24
Match Cards > 4.558%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

70%19/27
24/2927/29
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

54%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeJablonec at home · Liberec on the road
1414
1.86
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.21
50%7/14
Win Rate39%

Share of sampled matches won.

29%4/14
14%2/14
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%5/14
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.57
0.93
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.36
50%7/14
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%4/14
50%7/14
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%8/14
36%5/14
Over 2.546%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%8/14
1.89
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.92
1.15
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.53