Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 25·03/08/2026·10:30
Karviná
Karviná
WLLLL
1-2
Finished
HT0-2
Pardubice
Pardubice
DLLWD
📍 Town Stadium Karvina, Karvina
Season statsCzech Liga
Karviná24matchesPardubice24matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
38%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

47%
1533
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1485
46%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

61%
29%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

33%
2.54
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.98

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2424
1.33
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.08
42%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

25%
8%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

42%
13%
Clean Sheet10%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%
29%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

25%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2424
1.46
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.21
71%
Scored > 0.573%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

75%
88%
Over 1.588%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

88%
67%
Over 2.558%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
29%
Over 3.531%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
63%
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%
33%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

21%
21%
Scored Both Halves17%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

13%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2424
1.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.71
14.17
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.79
4.50
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.71
3.08
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.88
69%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

61%
13%
Clean Sheet10%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

8%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2424
1.79
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.58
1.82
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.60
-0.03
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.01
-0.54
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.41
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.14

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2424
14.54
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.50
5.04
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.38
8.75
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.17
60%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
35%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2424
54%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

47%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

74%
384.63
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

332.54
0.08
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.03

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2424
25%6/24
Leading at HT21%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

17%4/24
46%11/24
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

46%11/24
29%7/24
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

38%9/24
58%14/24
HT/FT Same Outcome50%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

42%10/24
83%5/6
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%2/4
0%0/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered22%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

44%4/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 24/2424/242424
13%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
11%
16-30'10%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
21%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

10%
21%
46-60'24%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

28%
13%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
21%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 24/2424/242424
52%12/23
Scored First43%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

35%8/23
48%11/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

65%15/23
75%9/12
Win when Scoring First69%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

63%5/8
9%1/11
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

7%1/15
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

37'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 24/2424/242424
25%6/24
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

25%6/24
38%9/24
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

42%10/24
88%7/8
Lead Saved after 75'77%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%4/6
13%1/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%2/6
0%0/24
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/24

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 24/2424/242424
84%32/38
Open-Play Share85%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%25/29
8%3/38
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%2/29
8%3/38
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%2/29
5%2/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%3/41
0%0/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

5%2/41

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2424
4.75
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.42
5.58
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.42
46%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
-0.57
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.27
75%18/24
Match Corners > 8.573%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

71%17/24
58%14/24
Match Corners > 9.556%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

54%13/24
58%14/24
Match Corners > 10.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%7/24

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 24/2424/242424
1.08
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.42
21%5/24
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

25%6/24
12.58
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.83
58%11/19
Match Cards > 3.569%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

81%17/21
19/2421/24
32%6/19
Match Cards > 4.549%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

67%14/21
19/2421/24
58%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

72%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeKarviná at home · Pardubice on the road
1211
1.17
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.09
33%4/12
Win Rate30%

Share of sampled matches won.

27%3/11
50%6/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

45%5/11
1.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.55
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.73
17%2/12
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%1/11
58%7/12
BTTS66%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

73%8/11
50%6/12
Over 2.557%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%7/11
1.75
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.57
1.67
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.89