Czech Liga·
Regular Season - 24·02/28/2026·09:00
Pardubice
Pardubice
LLWDW
1-1
Finished
HT1-1
Teplice
Teplice
LDWLL
📍 Stadion Arnosta Kostala, Pardubice
Season statsCzech Liga
Pardubice23matchesTeplice23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Czech Liga.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
53%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

51%
1485
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1520
64%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

54%
41%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

47%
2.08
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.26

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
1.09
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.09
26%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

26%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

30%
43%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%
9%
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%
26%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.22
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
74%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
87%
Over 1.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

61%
52%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

48%
35%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
70%
BTTS59%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

48%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

4%
13%
Scored Both Halves15%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

17%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
1.74
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.26
12.91
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.91
4.74
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.48
2.83
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.13
60%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
9%
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

39%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.55
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.21
1.60
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.19
-0.05
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.02
-0.36
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.21
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
10.39
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.22
3.30
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.35
7.04
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.13
68%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
32%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
12%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

41%
74%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

68%
328.39
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

293.35
-0.06
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.16

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
17%4/23
Leading at HT22%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

26%6/23
43%10/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

43%10/23
39%9/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%7/23
39%9/23
HT/FT Same Outcome52%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

65%15/23
50%2/4
Led at HT → Won50%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%3/6
44%4/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered29%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
11%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
11%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
7%
31-45'12%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
29%
46-60'20%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

12%
21%
61-75'21%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

20%
21%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

24%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
36%8/22
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

58%11/19
64%14/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

42%8/19
63%5/8
Win when Scoring First54%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

45%5/11
7%1/14
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%1/8
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

32'
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

23'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
26%6/23
Scored after 75'28%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%7/23
43%10/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

22%5/23
67%4/6
Lead Saved after 75'65%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

63%5/8
33%2/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

38%3/8
0%0/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
86%24/28
Open-Play Share83%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

80%20/25
7%2/28
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

12%3/25
7%2/28
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%2/25
5%2/40
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/28
5%2/40
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%1/28

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
4.35
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.87
5.57
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.57
44%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
-0.63
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.38
74%17/23
Match Corners > 8.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

48%11/23
57%13/23
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

30%7/23
30%7/23
Match Corners > 10.526%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

22%5/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
2.43
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.39
22%5/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%2/23
13.96
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.39
80%16/20
Match Cards > 3.583%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

85%17/20
20/2320/23
65%13/20
Match Cards > 4.563%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

60%12/20
20/2320/23
72%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePardubice at home · Teplice on the road
1211
1.08
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
25%3/12
Win Rate22%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
42%5/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%4/11
0.92
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.82
1.75
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.27
8%1/12
Clean Sheet22%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%4/11
67%8/12
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%5/11
42%5/12
Over 2.544%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
1.29
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.13
1.63
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.40