Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 28·03/07/2026·12:15
Dender
Dender
DLLLL
2-2
Finished
HT2-1
Charleroi
Charleroi
LLLLL
📍 Dender Football Complex, Denderleeuw
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Dender27matchesCharleroi27matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
34%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

31%
1413
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1622
39%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

48%
28%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

14%
2.36
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.52

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2727
0.67
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.22
11%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
56%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

44%
19%
Clean Sheet22%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%
41%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

19%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2727
0.78
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
59%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

81%
67%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
48%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

48%
26%
Over 3.528%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
56%
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

59%
7%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

11%
15%
Scored Both Halves19%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

22%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2727
1.63
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.37
14.81
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.85
4.59
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.81
3.08
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.48
26/27
65%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

65%
19%
Clean Sheet22%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

26%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2727
1.24
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.28
1.46
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.45
-0.22
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.17
-0.32
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.20
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2727
10.85
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.70
3.93
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.30
7.74
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.00
71%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
7%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2727
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
75%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

79%
387.19
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

382.44
-0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2727
15%4/27
Leading at HT24%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%9/27
48%13/27
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

41%11/27
37%10/27
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

26%7/27
56%15/27
HT/FT Same Outcome57%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

59%16/27
25%1/4
Led at HT → Won51%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

78%7/9
10%1/10
Trailed at HT → Recovered19%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

29%2/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 27/2727/272727
29%
0-15'23%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

18%
5%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

18%
10%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
19%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
10%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
29%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

24%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 27/2727/272727
39%9/23
Scored First46%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

54%14/26
61%14/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

46%12/26
33%3/9
Win when Scoring First49%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

64%9/14
0%0/14
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/12
17'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

21'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 27/2727/272727
22%6/27
Scored after 75'26%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

30%8/27
41%11/27
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

19%5/27
100%3/3
Lead Saved after 75'94%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

89%8/9
0%0/3
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

11%1/9
11%3/27
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/27

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 27/2727/272727
86%18/21
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%33/38
14%3/21
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%3/38
0%0/21
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%2/38
11%5/45
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

26%9/35
0%0/45
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/35

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2727
3.56
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.15
5.48
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.70
39%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

52%
-1.94
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.00
52%14/27
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%17/27
41%11/27
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

44%12/27
33%9/27
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

37%10/27

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 27/2727/272727
2.11
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.07
11%3/27
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

15%4/27
11.15
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.67
59%13/22
Match Cards > 3.569%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%18/23
22/2723/27
55%12/22
Match Cards > 4.551%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

48%11/23
22/2723/27
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

77%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeDender at home · Charleroi on the road
1313
0.54
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.23
8%1/13
Win Rate23%

Share of sampled matches won.

38%5/13
62%8/13
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

54%7/13
0.69
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.23
1.77
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.38
23%3/13
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%3/13
46%6/13
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

54%7/13
46%6/13
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

54%7/13
1.28
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.17
1.30
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.28