Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 26·02/22/2026·12:30
Zulte Waregem
Zulte Waregem
LWLLW
2-4
Finished
HT0-3
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
DWLLL
📍 Elindus Arena, Waregem
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Waregem25matchesAnderlecht25matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
41%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

43%
1573
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1616
42%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

42%
40%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

43%
3.18
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.79

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2525
1.16
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.48
28%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

40%
32%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

28%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

32%
20%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
24%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

32%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2525
1.36
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.20
76%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

68%
80%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

64%
48%
Over 2.542%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

36%
36%
Over 3.532%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

28%
64%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

12%
16%
Scored Both Halves14%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

12%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2525
1.52
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.20
13.48
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.76
4.72
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.76
3.16
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.44
67%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

65%
20%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2525
1.27
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.59
1.50
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.22
-0.23
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.38
0.14
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.52
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2525
11.60
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.04
4.12
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.64
7.24
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.04
62%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
36%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
12%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2525
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
400.44
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

442.68
-0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2525
24%6/25
Leading at HT26%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

28%7/25
48%12/25
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

48%12/25
28%7/25
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

24%6/25
44%11/25
HT/FT Same Outcome52%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%15/25
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won61%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
43%3/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered30%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

17%1/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 25/2525/252525
9%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

18%
23%
16-30'19%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

14%
20%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

7%
9%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
11%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
29%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 25/2525/252525
48%11/23
Scored First51%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

55%12/22
52%12/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

45%10/22
45%5/11
Win when Scoring First56%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%8/12
17%2/12
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%2/10
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

39'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

30'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 25/2525/252525
36%9/25
Scored after 75'28%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

20%5/25
40%10/25
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%8/25
80%4/5
Lead Saved after 75'73%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%8/12
20%1/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%4/12
8%2/25
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

4%1/25

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 25/2525/252525
83%29/35
Open-Play Share84%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%24/28
14%5/35
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

14%4/28
3%1/35
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/28
8%3/38
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

16%5/32
0%0/38
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%2/32

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2525
4.28
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.40
5.48
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.40
44%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

59%
-0.34
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.70
52%13/25
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

84%21/25
48%12/25
Match Corners > 9.562%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

76%19/25
44%11/25
Match Corners > 10.552%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

60%15/25

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 25/2525/252525
1.60
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.52
12%3/25
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%2/25
11.04
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.92
73%16/22
Match Cards > 3.580%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

88%21/24
22/2524/25
55%12/22
Match Cards > 4.565%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

75%18/24
22/2524/25
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeWaregem at home · Anderlecht on the road
1212
1.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
42%5/12
Win Rate33%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%3/12
33%4/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%6/12
1.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
1.17
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
25%3/12
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%3/12
50%6/12
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%4/12
33%4/12
Over 2.533%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%4/12
1.42
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.69
1.22
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.55