Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 21·01/18/2026·07:30
Gent
Gent
LWWLL
4-2
Finished
HT1-2
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
WLLDW
📍 Planet Group Arena, Gent
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Gent20matchesAnderlecht20matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
57%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1543
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1621
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

61%
59%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

42%
1.98
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.63

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2020
1.30
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.75
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
25%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

25%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%
25%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
20%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

20%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2020
1.40
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.40
80%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

80%
85%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

65%
55%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%
30%
Over 3.530%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
60%
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%
15%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

15%
25%
Scored Both Halves20%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

15%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2020
1.45
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.10
14.55
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.70
5.30
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.75
3.80
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.50
72%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
25%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2020
1.44
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.41
1.60
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.28
-0.16
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.12
-0.13
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.17
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2020
13.35
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.05
4.40
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.85
8.45
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.95
63%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
33%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2020
51%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
456.75
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

441.70
-0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.07

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2020
25%5/20
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

30%6/20
40%8/20
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

45%9/20
35%7/20
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%5/20
50%10/20
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%12/20
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won72%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%5/6
29%2/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered24%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 20/2020/202020
13%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
17%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
10%
31-45'7%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

4%
13%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

23%
10%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

23%
37%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

19%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 20/2020/202020
47%9/19
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

58%11/19
53%10/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

42%8/19
67%6/9
Win when Scoring First70%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
10%1/10
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%2/8
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

42'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 20/2020/202020
45%9/20
Scored after 75'35%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

25%5/20
30%6/20
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

30%6/20
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'79%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

73%8/11
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

27%3/11
0%0/20
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

5%1/20

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 20/2020/202020
90%27/30
Open-Play Share87%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

85%22/26
7%2/30
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

15%4/26
3%1/30
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/26
4%1/28
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

17%4/24
0%0/28
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%2/24

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2020
4.65
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.35
5.00
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.85
48%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

62%
-0.84
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.33
55%11/20
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

80%16/20
45%9/20
Match Corners > 9.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

70%14/20
40%8/20
Match Corners > 10.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%10/20

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 20/2020/202020
1.65
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.60
15%3/20
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

10%2/20
10.75
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.15
67%12/18
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

89%17/19
18/2019/20
50%9/18
Match Cards > 4.562%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

74%14/19
18/2019/20
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGent at home · Anderlecht on the road
109
1.70
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
50%5/10
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%3/9
30%3/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%3/9
1.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.11
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
40%4/10
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%3/9
50%5/10
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%3/9
50%5/10
Over 2.542%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%3/9
1.63
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.17
1.31
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.68