Jupiler Pro League·
Regular Season - 19·12/21/2025·12:30
Antwerp
Antwerp
WWDWL
2-2
Finished
HT2-0
Anderlecht
Anderlecht
WLDWW
📍 Bosuilstadion, Deurne
Season statsJupiler Pro League
Antwerp18matchesAnderlecht18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Jupiler Pro League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
68%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

65%
1591
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1638
56%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
80%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

62%
2.96
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.26

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1818
1.28
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.89
33%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

56%
28%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%
22%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%
33%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

22%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1818
1.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.39
67%
Scored > 0.572%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
72%
Over 1.567%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

61%
33%
Over 2.533%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%
11%
Over 3.519%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

28%
50%
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

39%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
22%
Scored Both Halves19%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

17%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1818
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
14.67
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.00
4.72
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.39
3.44
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.22
73%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
22%
Clean Sheet33%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1818
1.56
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.42
1.43
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.26
0.13
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.16
-0.17
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.19
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1818
11.44
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.11
4.17
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.00
6.94
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.83
61%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

58%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
10%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1818
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
78%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
370.33
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

445.28
-0.07
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.07

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1818
22%4/18
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%6/18
56%10/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%9/18
22%4/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

17%3/18
61%11/18
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

61%11/18
75%3/4
Led at HT → Won79%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%5/6
0%0/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered0%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1818/181818
14%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
19%
16-30'16%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
14%
31-45'9%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

4%
10%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
10%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

26%
33%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

17%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1818/181818
59%10/17
Scored First62%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

65%11/17
41%7/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

35%6/17
50%5/10
Win when Scoring First61%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
14%1/7
Win when Conceding First24%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%2/6
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

42'
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

29'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1818/181818
28%5/18
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

22%4/18
28%5/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%6/18
100%4/4
Lead Saved after 75'86%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

73%8/11
0%0/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

27%3/11
0%0/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

6%1/18

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1818/181818
81%17/21
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%21/23
19%4/21
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%2/23
0%0/21
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/23
0%0/18
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

15%3/20
0%0/18
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

10%2/20

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1818
3.83
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.33
5.33
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.78
42%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

63%
-1.54
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.34
50%9/18
Match Corners > 8.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

78%14/18
39%7/18
Match Corners > 9.553%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

67%12/18
28%5/18
Match Corners > 10.536%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

44%8/18

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1818/181818
2.17
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.67
11%2/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%2/18
12.39
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.56
87%13/15
Match Cards > 3.585%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

82%14/17
15/1817/18
67%10/15
Match Cards > 4.572%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

76%13/17
15/1817/18
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAntwerp at home · Anderlecht on the road
98
1.56
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.38
44%4/9
Win Rate41%

Share of sampled matches won.

38%3/8
33%3/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

38%3/8
1.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
1.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
11%1/9
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

38%3/8
78%7/9
BTTS51%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

25%2/8
67%6/9
Over 2.546%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%2/8
1.68
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.12
1.44
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.55