Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 25·02/02/2026·14:00
Jong PSV U21
Jong PSV U21
WWLWL
3-2
Finished
HT2-0
Cambuur
Cambuur
WWWWD
📍 De Herdgang, Eindhoven
Season statsEerste Divisie
U2123matchesCambuur22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
53%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

85%
1381
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1544
46%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

77%
60%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

92%
4.68
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.75

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2322
1.61
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.27
48%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

68%
17%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

23%
35%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

9%
17%
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%
13%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

9%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2322
2.09
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.18
87%
Scored > 0.589%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

91%
91%
Over 1.582%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

73%
83%
Over 2.569%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%
61%
Over 3.553%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

45%
70%
BTTS62%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%
30%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

32%
52%
Scored Both Halves47%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

41%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2322
1.91
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.05
18.70
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.32
6.30
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.91
4.61
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.73
73%
Save %75%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

76%
17%
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2322
2.37
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.66
2.32
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.29
0.05
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.38
-0.24
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.49
0.16
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.19

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2322
14.70
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.09
6.26
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.91
8.04
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.95
55%
Box Shot %59%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

64%
43%
On-Target %42%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

42%
14%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

15%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2322
51%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

57%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
409.57
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

489.68
0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2322
61%14/23
Leading at HT58%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

55%12/22
13%3/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

27%6/22
26%6/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

18%4/22
57%13/23
HT/FT Same Outcome67%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

77%17/22
64%9/14
Led at HT → Won82%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%12/12
33%2/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered42%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%2/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2322/222322
19%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
15%
16-30'17%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
19%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
23%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

10%
13%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
13%
76-90+'17%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2322/222322
65%15/23
Scored First66%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

67%14/21
35%8/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

33%7/21
60%9/15
Win when Scoring First76%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

93%13/14
25%2/8
Win when Conceding First27%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

29%2/7
20'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

30'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2322/222322
26%6/23
Scored after 75'34%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

41%9/22
43%10/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

23%5/22
71%10/14
Lead Saved after 75'82%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

92%12/13
29%4/14
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

8%1/13
0%0/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2322/222322
88%42/48
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

96%46/48
10%5/48
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

2%1/48
2%1/48
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

2%1/48
2%1/44
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/23
2%1/44
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%1/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2322
4.48
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.14
6.78
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.50
40%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

64%
-1.72
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.36
83%19/23
Match Corners > 8.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

68%15/22
74%17/23
Match Corners > 9.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

55%12/22
65%15/23
Match Corners > 10.551%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

36%8/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2322/222322
1.78
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.41
0%0/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/22
12.22
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.77
65%13/20
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

60%9/15
20/2315/22
25%5/20
Match Cards > 4.539%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

53%8/15
20/2315/22
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeU21 at home · Cambuur on the road
1111
1.82
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.91
55%6/11
Win Rate55%

Share of sampled matches won.

55%6/11
27%3/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

18%2/11
2.09
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.82
1.36
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.18
27%3/11
Clean Sheet32%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%4/11
55%6/11
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%6/11
82%9/11
Over 2.564%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
2.32
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.26
2.14
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.76