Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 23·01/17/2026·10:30
FC OSS
FC OSS
LLLDL
4-0
Finished
HT4-0
Emmen
Emmen
LWLWD
📍 Frans Heesen Stadion, Oss
Season statsEerste Divisie
OSS21matchesEmmen21matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
32%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1380
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1441
43%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

56%
20%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

48%
3.03
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.84

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2121
0.95
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.33
19%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
38%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

19%
43%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%
24%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%
29%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

14%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2121
1.24
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.86
71%
Scored > 0.579%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

86%
76%
Over 1.583%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
52%
Over 2.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%
29%
Over 3.543%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

57%
62%
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

24%
24%
Scored Both Halves31%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

38%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2121
1.76
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.86
18.67
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.24
5.71
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.48
3.95
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.48
69%
Save %66%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

63%
24%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2121
1.43
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.09
2.03
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.00
-0.60
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.10
-0.33
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.28
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.16

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2121
11.29
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.14
3.48
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.14
7.43
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.86
66%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
31%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

36%
11%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

13%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2121
43%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
76%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
339.24
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

429.62
-0.19
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2121
33%7/21
Leading at HT33%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%7/21
29%6/21
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

29%6/21
38%8/21
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

38%8/21
67%14/21
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

52%11/21
43%3/7
Led at HT → Won57%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
13%1/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered25%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

38%3/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 21/2121/212121
19%
0-15'20%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

20%
15%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
15%
31-45'11%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

8%
15%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

15%
23%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
12%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

33%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 21/2121/212121
50%9/18
Scored First54%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

57%12/21
50%9/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

43%9/21
33%3/9
Win when Scoring First38%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

42%5/12
11%1/9
Win when Conceding First22%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

33%3/9
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
13'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

23'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 21/2121/212121
19%4/21
Scored after 75'40%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

62%13/21
52%11/21
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

48%10/21
50%3/6
Lead Saved after 75'63%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

75%6/8
50%3/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

25%2/8
0%0/21
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

5%1/21

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 21/2121/212121
92%24/26
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

95%38/40
4%1/26
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

3%1/40
4%1/26
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/40
0%0/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%3/39
3%1/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/39

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2121
4.24
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.05
7.19
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.57
37%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

52%
-3.63
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.10
76%16/21
Match Corners > 8.574%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

71%15/21
71%15/21
Match Corners > 9.562%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

52%11/21
62%13/21
Match Corners > 10.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

33%7/21

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 21/2121/212121
1.86
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.62
10%2/21
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/21
15.29
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.52
63%12/19
Match Cards > 3.562%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

61%11/18
19/2118/21
37%7/19
Match Cards > 4.541%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%8/18
19/2118/21
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

57%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeOSS at home · Emmen on the road
1111
0.82
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.91
18%2/11
Win Rate23%

Share of sampled matches won.

27%3/11
55%6/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

64%7/11
1.36
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.18
1.82
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.09
18%2/11
Clean Sheet14%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%1/11
64%7/11
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

64%7/11
73%8/11
Over 2.568%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

64%7/11
1.49
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.30
2.18
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.33