Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 20·12/12/2025·14:00
De Graafschap
De Graafschap
WWWLW
2-3
Finished
HT2-0
Roda
Roda
LDLDL
📍 De Vijverberg, Doetinchem
Season statsEerste Divisie
Graafschap19matchesRoda19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
78%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

37%
1472
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1432
67%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

53%
89%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

20%
3.92
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.00

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
1.79
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.47
53%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

37%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

37%
26%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

26%
5%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%
16%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

16%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
1.95
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.58
84%
Scored > 0.584%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

84%
89%
Over 1.584%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
63%
Over 2.561%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

58%
53%
Over 3.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

42%
79%
BTTS71%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%
47%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

16%
42%
Scored Both Halves37%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

32%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
1.47
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.42
17.95
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.16
5.84
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.74
4.32
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.26
74%
Save %71%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

69%
5%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
2.25
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.04
2.08
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.79
0.17
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.25
-0.22
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.47
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.14

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
19.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.89
7.16
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.89
12.26
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.42
65%
Box Shot %66%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
38%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
52%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

52%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

82%
416.32
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

450.00
0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
47%9/19
Leading at HT32%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

16%3/19
37%7/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

42%8/19
16%3/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

42%8/19
58%11/19
HT/FT Same Outcome61%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

63%12/19
78%7/9
Led at HT → Won89%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered35%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

38%3/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
24%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

3%
11%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
22%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

16%
16%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
8%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
19%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
53%10/19
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

53%9/17
47%9/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

47%8/17
80%8/10
Win when Scoring First73%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

67%6/9
22%2/9
Win when Conceding First17%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%1/8
18'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

38'
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

26'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
32%6/19
Scored after 75'34%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

37%7/19
42%8/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%6/19
88%7/8
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

78%7/9
13%1/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

22%2/9
0%0/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
100%37/37
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

81%25/31
0%0/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

16%5/31
0%0/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/31
4%1/28
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/26
0%0/28
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/26

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
7.42
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.89
6.32
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.89
54%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
-0.19
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.44
95%18/19
Match Corners > 8.579%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%12/19
79%15/19
Match Corners > 9.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

53%10/19
68%13/19
Match Corners > 10.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

53%10/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
1.68
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.16
5%1/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/19
12.11
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.32
73%11/15
Match Cards > 3.558%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

43%6/14
15/1914/19
27%4/15
Match Cards > 4.520%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

14%2/14
15/1914/19
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

73%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGraafschap at home · Roda on the road
99
1.89
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.67
56%5/9
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

44%4/9
22%2/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

22%2/9
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.33
1.44
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
11%1/9
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%2/9
78%7/9
BTTS72%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%6/9
56%5/9
Over 2.561%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%6/9
2.37
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.72
1.27
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.95