Eerste Divisie·
Regular Season - 19·12/05/2025·14:00
Cambuur
Cambuur
DWDWW
2-1
Finished
HT2-1
Den Bosch
Den Bosch
WLWWL
📍 Kooi Stadion, Leeuwarden
Season statsEerste Divisie
Cambuur18matchesBosch18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eerste Divisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
65%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

63%
1506
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1423
65%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

59%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

67%
3.58
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

4.48

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1818
2.11
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.61
61%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
28%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

11%
11%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
39%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%
11%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1818
2.17
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.06
89%
Scored > 0.589%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
72%
Over 1.581%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
50%
Over 2.567%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

83%
50%
Over 3.553%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

56%
56%
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

72%
28%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

33%
44%
Scored Both Halves39%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1818
1.17
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
13.17
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.39
4.89
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

6.11
3.56
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

4.11
73%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
39%
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1818
2.61
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.31
1.63
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

2.19
0.98
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.12
-0.49
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.42
0.18
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1818
14.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.61
5.94
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.17
8.67
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.28
62%
Box Shot %65%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
42%
On-Target %40%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
15%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

15%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1818
58%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

79%
493.78
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

376.83
0.16
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.07

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1818
50%9/18
Leading at HT44%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

39%7/18
28%5/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

28%5/18
22%4/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%6/18
78%14/18
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%9/18
100%9/9
Led at HT → Won86%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

71%5/7
50%2/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered42%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%2/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1818/181818
10%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
18%
16-30'19%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
23%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
13%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
15%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

11%
21%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

31%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1818/181818
59%10/17
Scored First54%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%9/18
41%7/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%9/18
90%9/10
Win when Scoring First84%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

78%7/9
29%2/7
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

22%2/9
25'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

22'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1818/181818
39%7/18
Scored after 75'44%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

50%9/18
22%4/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%6/18
90%9/10
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

83%5/6
10%1/10
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

17%1/6
0%0/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/18

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1818/181818
95%37/39
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%32/36
3%1/39
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%3/36
3%1/39
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/36
5%1/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%4/37
5%1/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

5%2/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1818
6.22
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.17
3.33
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

7.22
65%
Corner Share56%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
2.68
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.73
67%12/18
Match Corners > 8.578%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

89%16/18
56%10/18
Match Corners > 9.572%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

89%16/18
39%7/18
Match Corners > 10.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

83%15/18

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1818/181818
1.50
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.67
6%1/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

6%1/18
9.83
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.44
62%8/13
Match Cards > 3.559%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

57%8/14
13/1814/18
38%5/13
Match Cards > 4.534%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

29%4/14
13/1814/18
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCambuur at home · Bosch on the road
99
2.56
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
78%7/9
Win Rate61%

Share of sampled matches won.

44%4/9
0%0/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

56%5/9
2.44
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.56
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.33
44%4/9
Clean Sheet28%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%1/9
56%5/9
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%6/9
56%5/9
Over 2.572%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

89%8/9
2.67
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.55
1.12
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.45