Eredivisie·
Regular Season - 23·02/14/2026·15:00
Groningen
Groningen
LLLWD
1-2
Finished
HT0-0
Utrecht
Utrecht
WLDLL
📍 Euroborg, Groningen
Season statsEredivisie
Groningen22matchesUtrecht22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eredivisie.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
32%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

45%
1545
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1531
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

40%
19%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

50%
2.44
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.49

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
1.41
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.23
41%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

32%
18%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

27%
41%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

41%
32%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%
27%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

18%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
1.32
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
73%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

82%
86%
Over 1.582%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

77%
45%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%
18%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
45%
BTTS57%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

68%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

18%
36%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

27%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
1.27
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.32
11.14
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.73
3.95
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.64
2.71
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.23
21/22
66%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
32%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
1.66
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.24
1.41
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.42
0.25
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.19
-0.40
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.03
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
15.82
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.45
5.95
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.09
9.18
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.45
58%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
38%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
8%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
51%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

47%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

79%
425.05
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

404.55
0.02
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.09

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
27%6/22
Leading at HT32%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

36%8/22
50%11/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

23%5/22
23%5/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

41%9/22
55%12/22
HT/FT Same Outcome66%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

77%17/22
83%5/6
Led at HT → Won79%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%6/8
20%1/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered21%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

22%2/9

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
10%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
14%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

9%
24%
31-45'24%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

24%
7%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

27%
17%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
28%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

15%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
43%9/21
Scored First44%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

45%10/22
57%12/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

55%12/22
78%7/9
Win when Scoring First69%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%6/10
17%2/12
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

8%1/12
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

25'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
36%8/22
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

23%5/22
27%6/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%7/22
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'88%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

75%6/8
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

25%2/8
0%0/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
93%27/29
Open-Play Share97%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%33/33
3%1/29
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/33
3%1/29
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/33
4%1/28
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%1/29
4%1/28
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
6.55
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.95
4.36
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.55
60%
Corner Share56%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

52%
2.49
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.18
77%17/22
Match Corners > 8.570%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

64%14/22
55%12/22
Match Corners > 9.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

55%12/22
41%9/22
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

36%8/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
1.91
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.50
9%2/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/22
10.95
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.95
65%13/20
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

61%11/18
20/2218/22
40%8/20
Match Cards > 4.542%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%8/18
20/2218/22
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

73%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGroningen at home · Utrecht on the road
1111
1.36
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.91
36%4/11
Win Rate27%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
36%4/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

45%5/11
1.45
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.36
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.64
36%4/11
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%1/11
45%5/11
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

82%9/11
55%6/11
Over 2.555%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%6/11
1.79
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.22
1.10
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.44