Premier League·
Regular Season - 20·01/03/2026·10:00
Wolves
Wolves
DLLLL
3-0
Finished
HT3-0
West Ham
West Ham
DLLLD
📍 Molineux Stadium, Wolverhampton
Season statsPremier League
Wolves19matchesHam19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Premier League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
26%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

35%
1448
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1588
22%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

41%
30%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

29%
2.48
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.94

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
0.16
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.74
0%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

16%
16%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

26%
84%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

58%
0%
Clean Sheet3%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

5%
53%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

37%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
0.58
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.11
47%
Scored > 0.555%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

63%
79%
Over 1.587%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

95%
47%
Over 2.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

63%
26%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

32%
47%
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

58%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

11%
5%
Scored Both Halves8%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

11%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
2.11
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
13.74
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.47
4.89
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.42
2.89
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.63
59%
Save %63%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
0%
Clean Sheet3%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

5%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
1.04
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.18
1.49
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.78
-0.45
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.60
-0.18
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.01
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
8.79
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.00
2.89
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.53
5.68
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.16
65%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

72%
33%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
7%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
45%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

42%
79%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

78%
385.58
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

368.47
-0.11
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
5%1/19
Leading at HT13%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

21%4/19
53%10/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

42%8/19
42%8/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

37%7/19
53%10/19
HT/FT Same Outcome50%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

47%9/19
0%0/1
Led at HT → Won13%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

25%1/4
0%0/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered7%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
7%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

24%
7%
16-30'6%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

5%
29%
31-45'24%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
14%
46-60'10%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

5%
14%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

10%
29%
76-90+'33%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

38%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
16%3/19
Scored First24%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

32%6/19
84%16/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

68%13/19
0%0/3
Win when Scoring First8%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

17%1/6
0%0/16
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

15%2/13
44'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

31'
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

38'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
21%4/19
Scored after 75'24%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

26%5/19
32%6/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

42%8/19
0%0/2
Lead Saved after 75'0%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

0%0/3
100%2/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

100%3/3
5%1/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
64%9/14
Open-Play Share75%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%18/21
7%1/14
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%2/21
29%4/14
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%1/21
0%0/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%3/38
3%1/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/38

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
2.89
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.21
6.42
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.26
31%
Corner Share38%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
-2.88
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.28
63%12/19
Match Corners > 8.571%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

79%15/19
58%11/19
Match Corners > 9.563%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

68%13/19
37%7/19
Match Corners > 10.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

63%12/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
2.11
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.68
11%2/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%2/19
14.21
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.68
69%9/13
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

87%13/15
13/1915/19
38%5/13
Match Cards > 4.533%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

27%4/15
13/1915/19
64%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeWolves at home · Ham on the road
99
0.11
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.78
0%0/9
Win Rate6%

Share of sampled matches won.

11%1/9
89%8/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

44%4/9
0.78
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.00
2.56
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.67
0%0/9
Clean Sheet6%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

11%1/9
56%5/9
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

56%5/9
56%5/9
Over 2.556%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%5/9
1.41
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.15
1.59
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.81