Serie A·
Regular Season - 37·05/17/2026·06:00
Como
Como
WDWLL
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
Parma
Parma
LLWWD
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Como
Season statsSerie A
Como36matchesParma36matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
64%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

45%
1755
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1599
65%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

47%
63%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

43%
2.48
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.18

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3636
1.81
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.17
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

28%
31%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
19%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
50%
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
25%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

42%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3636
1.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.75
75%
Scored > 0.567%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

58%
72%
Over 1.567%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

61%
44%
Over 2.538%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

31%
22%
Over 3.519%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

17%
42%
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

42%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

11%
33%
Scored Both Halves22%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

11%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3636
0.78
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.25
9.25
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.14
3.19
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.33
2.39
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.00
75%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

69%
50%
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3636
1.59
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.76
0.84
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.59
0.74
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.84
0.14
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.08
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.07

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3636
14.19
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.78
5.03
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

2.75
9.31
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.94
66%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

55%
35%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

26%
12%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

7%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3636
61%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
87%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
529.69
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

364.19
0.22
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.12

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3636
42%15/36
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

14%5/36
44%16/36
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

58%21/36
14%5/36
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

28%10/36
61%22/36
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%20/36
73%11/15
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

60%3/5
40%2/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered30%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%2/10

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 36/3636/363636
19%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

15%
12%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

12%
14%
31-45'13%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

12%
12%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

15%
22%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

12%
22%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

35%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 36/3636/363636
67%20/30
Scored First53%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

40%12/30
33%10/30
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

60%18/30
75%15/20
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

75%9/12
30%3/10
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

6%1/18
23'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

39'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 36/3636/363636
33%12/36
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

25%9/36
11%4/36
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%12/36
94%15/16
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
6%1/16
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
0%0/36
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/36

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 36/3636/363636
93%55/59
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%24/26
7%4/59
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/26
0%0/59
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/26
14%4/29
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%5/46
3%1/29
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

4%2/46

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3636
4.19
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.97
3.28
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.81
56%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
1.17
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.93
28%10/36
Match Corners > 8.540%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

53%19/36
22%8/36
Match Corners > 9.529%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

36%13/36
17%6/36
Match Corners > 10.524%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

31%11/36

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 36/3636/363636
2.11
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.72
8%3/36
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

14%5/36
13.42
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.47
81%26/32
Match Cards > 3.579%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

76%22/29
32/3629/36
56%18/32
Match Cards > 4.552%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

48%14/29
32/3629/36
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeComo at home · Parma on the road
1818
1.83
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
50%9/18
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%6/18
17%3/18
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%6/18
1.89
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.67
0.83
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.11
50%9/18
Clean Sheet47%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%8/18
50%9/18
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%6/18
44%8/18
Over 2.536%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

28%5/18
2.17
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.71
0.82
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.49