Serie A·
Regular Season - 35·05/03/2026·14:45
Inter
Inter
DWWWW
2-0
Finished
HT1-0
Parma
Parma
WWDDL
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Meazza, Milan
Season statsSerie A
Inter34matchesParma34matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
79%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

64%
1944
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1599
72%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

58%
85%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

69%
3.99
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.78

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3434
2.32
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.24
74%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
12%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

35%
15%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

35%
47%
Clean Sheet41%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

35%
6%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

41%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3434
2.35
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.74
94%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

59%
82%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

59%
56%
Over 2.543%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%
38%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

15%
47%
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

41%
26%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

12%
53%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

12%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3434
0.91
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.18
9.09
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.18
2.88
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.24
2.00
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.97
69%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
47%
Clean Sheet41%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

35%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3434
1.80
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.82
1.16
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.41
0.65
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.60
0.64
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.01
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.08

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3434
17.53
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.97
6.12
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

2.82
12.41
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.03
71%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

55%
35%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

26%
13%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

7%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3434
60%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
87%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
542.38
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

364.71
0.18
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3434
56%19/34
Leading at HT35%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

15%5/34
29%10/34
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

62%21/34
15%5/34
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

24%8/34
62%21/34
HT/FT Same Outcome57%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

53%18/34
84%16/19
Led at HT → Won72%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

60%3/5
20%1/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered23%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%2/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 34/3434/343434
14%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
12%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
16%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

13%
18%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
19%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

13%
21%
76-90+'27%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

33%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 34/3434/343434
79%27/34
Scored First61%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

43%12/28
21%7/34
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

57%16/28
81%22/27
Win when Scoring First78%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

75%9/12
43%3/7
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

6%1/16
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

39'
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 34/3434/343434
35%12/34
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

24%8/34
32%11/34
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%10/34
84%21/25
Lead Saved after 75'82%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
16%4/25
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
0%0/34
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/34

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 34/3434/343434
94%72/77
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%22/24
6%5/77
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/24
0%0/77
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/24
12%4/34
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%4/41
9%3/34
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

5%2/41

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3434
6.41
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.03
2.91
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.68
69%
Corner Share58%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
2.44
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.37
59%20/34
Match Corners > 8.554%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%17/34
56%19/34
Match Corners > 9.546%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

35%12/34
44%15/34
Match Corners > 10.537%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%10/34

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 34/3434/343434
1.74
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.71
0%0/34
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%4/34
13.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.47
48%14/29
Match Cards > 3.562%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

75%21/28
29/3428/34
34%10/29
Match Cards > 4.540%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

46%13/28
29/3428/34
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

67%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeInter at home · Parma on the road
1717
2.41
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.41
76%13/17
Win Rate56%

Share of sampled matches won.

35%6/17
12%2/17
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%5/17
2.76
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.71
0.88
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.06
41%7/17
Clean Sheet44%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

47%8/17
53%9/17
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

35%6/17
71%12/17
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%5/17
2.15
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.81
0.71
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.41