Serie A·
Regular Season - 23·02/01/2026·12:00
Cremonese
Cremonese
LDLDL
0-2
Finished
HT0-2
Inter
Inter
WWLWW
📍 Stadio Giovanni Zini, Cremona
Season statsSerie A
Cremonese22matchesInter22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
31%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

73%
1530
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1937
40%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

76%
22%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

69%
2.01
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.23

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
1.05
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.36
23%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

77%
36%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

5%
41%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

18%
27%
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
45%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

5%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
0.91
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.27
55%
Scored > 0.575%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

95%
64%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

77%
36%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

59%
27%
Over 3.532%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
45%
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

27%
18%
Scored Both Halves36%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

55%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
1.32
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.86
16.55
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

8.36
5.59
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

2.64
4.27
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

1.77
76%
Save %72%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
27%
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
1.06
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.07
1.57
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.86
-0.51
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.21
-0.19
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.05
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
8.55
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

18.36
3.09
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

6.18
5.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

12.91
59%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

70%
36%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
11%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

60%
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

87%
383.32
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

532.95
-0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.17

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
23%5/22
Leading at HT39%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

55%12/22
41%9/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

32%7/22
36%8/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

14%3/22
68%15/22
HT/FT Same Outcome70%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

73%16/22
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won80%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%12/12
13%1/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered6%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
14%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
10%
16-30'10%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
19%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
19%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
10%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
29%
76-90+'26%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
44%8/18
Scored First63%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

82%18/22
56%10/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

18%4/22
63%5/8
Win when Scoring First76%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

89%16/18
0%0/10
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%1/4
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

27'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
27%6/22
Scored after 75'32%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%8/22
18%4/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%6/22
80%4/5
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

94%15/16
20%1/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

6%1/16
0%0/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
90%19/21
Open-Play Share91%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%44/48
5%1/21
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%4/48
5%1/21
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/48
7%2/28
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

10%2/21
0%0/28
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

10%2/21

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
3.32
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.91
6.23
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

2.82
35%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

71%
-1.75
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.60
68%15/22
Match Corners > 8.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

64%14/22
45%10/22
Match Corners > 9.552%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

59%13/22
32%7/22
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

45%10/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
2.09
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.55
5%1/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/22
13.05
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.36
65%11/17
Match Cards > 3.557%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

50%9/18
17/2218/22
47%8/17
Match Cards > 4.543%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

39%7/18
17/2218/22
62%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCremonese at home · Inter on the road
1010
1.10
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.40
20%2/10
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

80%8/10
30%3/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%2/10
1.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.70
1.30
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.90
30%3/10
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%6/10
60%6/10
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%4/10
40%4/10
Over 2.540%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%4/10
1.35
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.60
1.26
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.87