Serie A·
Regular Season - 23·02/01/2026·09:00
Como
Como
WWWLD
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Atalanta
Atalanta
LWLDW
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Como
Season statsSerie A
Como22matchesAtalanta22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
76%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

55%
1789
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1728
66%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

61%
85%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

49%
3.52
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.54

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
1.82
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.59
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

41%
32%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

36%
18%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

23%
50%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%
27%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

18%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
1.68
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.36
73%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

82%
73%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

77%
41%
Over 2.536%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

32%
23%
Over 3.520%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
36%
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

9%
32%
Scored Both Halves30%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

27%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
0.73
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.91
10.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.00
3.59
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.82
2.77
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.91
77%
Save %77%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

76%
50%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
1.89
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.88
0.96
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.11
0.93
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.77
0.16
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.34
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
13.95
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.50
5.18
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.50
8.73
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.50
63%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
37%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
12%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
61%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

56%
86%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
526.41
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

487.41
0.23
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.12

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
36%8/22
Leading at HT39%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

41%9/22
55%12/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

36%8/22
9%2/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

23%5/22
55%12/22
HT/FT Same Outcome68%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

82%18/22
75%6/8
Led at HT → Won82%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

89%8/9
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered35%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
19%
0-15'18%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
14%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

10%
5%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

23%
14%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
24%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

10%
24%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
68%13/19
Scored First68%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

67%14/21
32%6/19
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

33%7/21
77%10/13
Win when Scoring First71%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

64%9/14
17%1/6
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/7
22'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

38'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

37'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
36%8/22
Scored after 75'36%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%8/22
14%3/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%6/22
91%10/11
Lead Saved after 75'85%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%8/10
9%1/11
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%2/10
0%0/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
92%34/37
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

94%29/31
8%3/37
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

3%1/31
0%0/37
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/31
13%2/16
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%1/19
0%0/16
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/19

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
4.00
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.59
3.45
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.73
54%
Corner Share54%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

54%
1.21
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.56
32%7/22
Match Corners > 8.555%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

77%17/22
27%6/22
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

59%13/22
18%4/22
Match Corners > 10.534%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%11/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
2.18
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.41
9%2/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/22
13.82
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.77
74%14/19
Match Cards > 3.567%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

60%9/15
19/2215/22
58%11/19
Match Cards > 4.536%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

13%2/15
19/2215/22
60%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

74%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeComo at home · Atalanta on the road
1110
2.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.30
55%6/11
Win Rate42%

Share of sampled matches won.

30%3/10
9%1/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%3/10
1.82
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.20
0.64
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.10
55%6/11
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%3/10
45%5/11
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

60%6/10
27%3/11
Over 2.529%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%3/10
1.82
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.29
0.95
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.13