Serie A·
Regular Season - 19·01/06/2026·09:00
Pisa
Pisa
DLDLL
0-3
Finished
HT0-0
Como
Como
WWLLW
📍 Arena Garibaldi - Stadio Romeo Anconetani, Pisa
Season statsSerie A
Pisa18matchesComo17matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
39%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1491
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1791
41%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

65%
36%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

68%
2.13
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.20

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1817
0.67
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.76
6%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

47%
50%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

35%
44%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

18%
22%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

47%
56%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

35%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1817
0.72
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.35
44%
Scored > 0.555%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

65%
56%
Over 1.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

65%
33%
Over 2.531%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%
33%
Over 3.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
39%
BTTS37%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

35%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

18%
11%
Scored Both Halves20%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

29%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1817
1.39
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.71
15.61
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.65
4.56
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.76
3.17
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.94
70%
Save %74%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

78%
22%
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

47%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1817
1.14
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.51
1.37
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.96
-0.24
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.55
-0.27
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.03
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.11

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1817
9.94
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.76
2.17
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.88
7.39
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.35
74%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

61%
22%
On-Target %29%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
7%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1817
41%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

60%
76%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

86%
316.78
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

504.82
-0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.20

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1817
11%2/18
Leading at HT23%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

35%6/17
61%11/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

53%9/17
28%5/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

12%2/17
56%10/18
HT/FT Same Outcome54%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

53%9/17
0%0/2
Led at HT → Won33%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
20%1/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered35%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1817/171817
17%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
8%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
17%
31-45'13%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

9%
17%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
8%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

26%
33%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1817/171817
27%4/15
Scored First45%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

64%9/14
73%11/15
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

36%5/14
25%1/4
Win when Scoring First51%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

78%7/9
0%0/11
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%1/5
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

21'
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

29'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1817/171817
28%5/18
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%5/17
28%5/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

12%2/17
0/0
Lead Saved after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

88%7/8
0/0
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

13%1/8
0%0/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/17

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1817/171817
58%7/12
Open-Play Share77%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

96%22/23
42%5/12
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

4%1/23
0%0/12
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/23
0%0/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%1/12
4%1/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1817
3.56
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.94
5.28
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.82
40%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

51%
-1.09
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.36
50%9/18
Match Corners > 8.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

35%6/17
39%7/18
Match Corners > 9.534%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

29%5/17
22%4/18
Match Corners > 10.520%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

18%3/17

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1817/171817
1.94
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.29
11%2/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%2/17
13.11
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.82
56%9/16
Match Cards > 3.561%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

67%10/15
16/1815/17
31%5/16
Match Cards > 4.546%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

60%9/15
16/1815/17
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgePisa at home · Como on the road
99
0.67
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.33
11%1/9
Win Rate22%

Share of sampled matches won.

33%3/9
56%5/9
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%3/9
0.11
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.22
0.78
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
44%4/9
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%3/9
0%0/9
BTTS17%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%3/9
0%0/9
Over 2.522%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%4/9
1.26
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.20
1.29
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.05