Serie A·
Regular Season - 12·11/23/2025·14:45
Inter
Inter
WWWWL
0-1
Finished
HT0-0
AC Milan
AC Milan
DWDDW
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Meazza, Milan
Season statsSerie A
Inter11matchesMilan11matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
83%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1891
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1768
81%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

69%
84%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

64%
3.02
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.41

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1111
2.18
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.00
73%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

55%
0%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

36%
27%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

9%
45%
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

45%
0%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

9%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1111
2.36
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.55
100%
Scored > 0.595%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

91%
91%
Over 1.582%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

73%
73%
Over 2.564%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%
36%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
55%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%
27%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

18%
64%
Scored Both Halves41%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

18%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1111
1.09
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.82
9.09
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.00
3.36
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.18
2.27
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.64
68%
Save %75%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

83%
45%
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

45%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1111
2.06
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.80
0.88
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.15
1.17
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.65
0.07
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.15
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1111
18.09
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.64
5.45
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.82
12.45
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.27
69%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

68%
30%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
13%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1111
60%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
87%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

87%
536.82
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

476.09
0.19
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1111
55%6/11
Leading at HT50%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

45%5/11
18%2/11
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

55%6/11
27%3/11
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

0%0/11
82%9/11
HT/FT Same Outcome64%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

45%5/11
100%6/6
Led at HT → Won80%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

60%3/5
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0/0

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 11/1111/111111
21%
0-15'22%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

24%
17%
16-30'11%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

6%
8%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

24%
17%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

12%
25%
61-75'21%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
13%
76-90+'15%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

18%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 11/1111/111111
82%9/11
Scored First81%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

80%8/10
18%2/11
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

20%2/10
89%8/9
Win when Scoring First76%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

63%5/8
0%0/2
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%1/2
17'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
24'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

42'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 11/1111/111111
27%3/11
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

27%3/11
36%4/11
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

9%1/11
100%7/7
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
0%0/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
0%0/11
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/11

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 11/1111/111111
92%22/24
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%15/17
8%2/24
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

12%2/17
0%0/24
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/17
14%2/14
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

22%2/9
14%2/14
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/9

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1111
7.27
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.27
3.18
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.55
70%
Corner Share59%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

48%
2.93
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.31
73%8/11
Match Corners > 8.559%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

45%5/11
64%7/11
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

36%4/11
55%6/11
Match Corners > 10.545%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

36%4/11

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 11/1111/111111
1.45
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.45
0%0/11
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%1/11
12.91
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.91
44%4/9
Match Cards > 3.561%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%7/9
9/119/11
11%1/9
Match Cards > 4.528%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%4/9
9/119/11
69%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

80%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeInter at home · Milan on the road
65
2.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.80
83%5/6
Win Rate62%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%2/5
17%1/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/5
2.83
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.60
0.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.60
50%3/6
Clean Sheet55%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

60%3/5
50%3/6
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%2/5
83%5/6
Over 2.562%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

40%2/5
2.12
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.64
0.96
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.96