Premier League·
Regular Season - 17·09/24/2025·12:00
FC Gomel
FC Gomel
DWDLL
3-1
Finished
HT2-0
Neman
Neman
WLLLL
📍 Stadyen Central'ny, Homel' (Gomel)
Season statsPremier League
Gomel20matchesNeman18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Premier League.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
57%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

40%
1289
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1434
50%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

49%
64%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

31%
2.03
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.18

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2018
1.15
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.72
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

56%
25%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

6%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

39%
40%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
40%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

33%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2018
0.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.56
60%
Scored > 0.563%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

67%
55%
Over 1.558%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

61%
20%
Over 2.535%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
10%
Over 3.516%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

22%
30%
BTTS34%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

39%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

28%
10%
Scored Both Halves22%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2018
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.89
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.00
0/201/18
Save %

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

0%
0/201/18
40%
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2018
1.14
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.79
1.21
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.57
-0.08
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.13
-0.21
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.28
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.40

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2018
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.00
0/201/18

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2018
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

63%
0/201/18
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.22

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2018
30%6/20
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

28%5/18
50%10/20
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%9/18
20%4/20
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

22%4/18
50%10/20
HT/FT Same Outcome50%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%9/18
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%5/5
0%0/4
Trailed at HT → Recovered13%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%1/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 20/2018/182018
12%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
6%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
24%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
24%
46-60'22%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

21%
18%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

3%
18%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 20/2018/182018
50%9/18
Scored First51%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

53%9/17
50%9/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

47%8/17
67%6/9
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%9/9
0%0/9
Win when Conceding First6%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

13%1/8
41'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

20'
43'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 20/2018/182018
15%3/20
Scored after 75'21%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

28%5/18
25%5/20
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%3/18
63%5/8
Lead Saved after 75'81%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%10/10
38%3/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/10
0%0/20
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

11%2/18

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 20/2018/182018
88%15/17
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%26/29
6%1/17
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

7%2/29
6%1/17
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/29
5%1/19
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/15
0%0/19
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/15

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2018
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

0.00
0/201/18
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

2.00
0/201/18
Corner Share

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

0%
0/201/18
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-5.46
0/0
Match Corners > 8.5

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

0%0/1
0/201/18
0/0
Match Corners > 9.5

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

0%0/1
0/201/18
0/0
Match Corners > 10.5

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

0%0/1
0/201/18

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 20/2018/182018
1.32
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.54
19/2013/18
11%2/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

15%2/13
19/2013/18
0.00
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

0.23
19/2013/18
47%7/15
Match Cards > 3.559%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

71%10/14
15/2014/18
20%3/15
Match Cards > 4.524%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

29%4/14
15/2014/18
75%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

61%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGomel at home · Neman on the road
109
0.90
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.78
20%2/10
Win Rate38%

Share of sampled matches won.

56%5/9
50%5/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%3/9
0.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.67
1.10
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.89
30%3/10
Clean Sheet37%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

44%4/9
30%3/10
BTTS32%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%3/9
10%1/10
Over 2.527%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%4/9
0.89
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.60
1.24
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.73