Serie A·
Regular Season - 28·10/16/2025·20:30
Fluminense
Fluminense
LWDWD
1-0
Finished
HT0-0
Juventude
Juventude
LLDDD
📍 Estádio do Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro
Season statsSerie A
Fluminense26matchesJuventude27matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
63%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

33%
1655
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1469
60%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

38%
65%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

28%
2.42
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.36

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2627
1.46
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.85
42%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

22%
19%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

19%
38%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

59%
31%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%
23%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

44%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2627
1.31
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.81
77%
Scored > 0.566%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

56%
77%
Over 1.579%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

81%
46%
Over 2.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

48%
19%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
50%
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

41%
15%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

7%
31%
Scored Both Halves23%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

15%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2627
1.27
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.93
10.35
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.48
3.65
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.63
2.44
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.70
25/26
64%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
31%
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

19%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2627
1.16
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.83
0.94
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.46
0.22
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.63
0.21
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.02
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.08

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2627
12.27
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.33
3.85
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.15
7.46
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.07
61%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

59%
31%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

30%
11%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2627
53%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
85%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
480.08
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

342.56
0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.16

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2627
31%8/26
Leading at HT26%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

22%6/27
38%10/26
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

22%6/27
31%8/26
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

56%15/27
62%16/26
HT/FT Same Outcome66%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

70%19/27
88%7/8
Led at HT → Won77%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
25%2/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered19%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

13%2/15

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 26/2627/272627
15%
0-15'19%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

23%
0%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

18%
21%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
18%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
15%
61-75'12%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
32%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 26/2627/272627
56%14/25
Scored First47%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

38%10/26
44%11/25
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

62%16/26
64%9/14
Win when Scoring First57%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%5/10
18%2/11
Win when Conceding First12%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

6%1/16
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

32'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 26/2627/272627
42%11/26
Scored after 75'29%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

15%4/27
38%10/26
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

37%10/27
73%8/11
Lead Saved after 75'86%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
27%3/11
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
19%5/26
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

0%0/27

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 26/2627/272627
88%30/34
Open-Play Share90%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

91%20/22
9%3/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%2/22
3%1/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/22
0%0/33
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%6/53
3%1/33
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/53

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2627
4.38
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.93
5.15
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.74
46%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

45%
-0.41
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.01
69%18/26
Match Corners > 8.559%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

48%13/27
54%14/26
Match Corners > 9.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

33%9/27
23%6/26
Match Corners > 10.525%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

26%7/27

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 26/2627/272627
1.96
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.70
8%2/26
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%3/27
11.73
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.67
83%19/23
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

73%19/26
23/2626/27
65%15/23
Match Cards > 4.558%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%13/26
23/2626/27
58%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

58%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFluminense at home · Juventude on the road
1213
2.08
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.38
67%8/12
Win Rate37%

Share of sampled matches won.

8%1/13
25%3/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

77%10/13
1.42
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.46
0.83
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.69
33%4/12
Clean Sheet24%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

15%2/13
50%6/12
BTTS40%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

31%4/13
50%6/12
Over 2.556%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

62%8/13
1.48
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.68
0.76
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.74