Serie A·
Regular Season - 24·09/20/2025·15:00
Vitoria
Vitoria
LWLDL
0-1
Finished
HT0-1
Fluminense
Fluminense
LLWDL
📍 Estádio Manoel Barradas, Salvador, Bahia
Season statsSerie A
Vitoria23matchesFluminense21matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
39%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

45%
1448
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1600
47%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

52%
31%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

37%
3.09
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.86

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2321
0.96
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.33
17%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

38%
43%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

19%
39%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

43%
22%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

24%
43%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

29%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2321
0.83
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.19
57%
Scored > 0.564%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

71%
65%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

76%
39%
Over 2.541%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

43%
22%
Over 3.520%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

19%
48%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

52%
9%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

19%
13%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

29%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2321
1.48
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.38
15.78
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.10
5.26
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.76
3.70
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.50
20/21
70%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

63%
22%
Clean Sheet23%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

24%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2321
0.91
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.13
1.52
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.94
-0.61
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.19
-0.16
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.06
0.07
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2321
12.17
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.52
4.17
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.57
6.78
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.48
56%
Box Shot %58%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
34%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
7%
Shot Conversion8%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2321
43%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
347.57
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

492.43
-0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2321
22%5/23
Leading at HT23%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

24%5/21
39%9/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

43%9/21
39%9/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%7/21
65%15/23
HT/FT Same Outcome59%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

52%11/21
60%3/5
Led at HT → Won70%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

80%4/5
33%3/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered31%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

29%2/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2321/212321
16%
0-15'16%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
0%
16-30'0%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

0%
16%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

20%
26%
46-60'21%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
21%
61-75'19%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
21%
76-90+'27%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

32%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2321/212321
35%7/20
Scored First43%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

50%10/20
65%13/20
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

50%10/20
43%3/7
Win when Scoring First51%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%6/10
8%1/13
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%2/10
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

40'
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2321/212321
17%4/23
Scored after 75'28%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%8/21
35%8/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

38%8/21
43%3/7
Lead Saved after 75'53%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

63%5/8
57%4/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

38%3/8
0%0/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

24%5/21

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2321/212321
100%19/19
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%22/25
0%0/19
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%2/25
0%0/19
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%1/25
9%3/34
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/29
0%0/34
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/29

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2321
4.43
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.48
5.30
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.33
46%
Corner Share46%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

46%
-0.70
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.88
57%13/23
Match Corners > 8.566%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

76%16/21
48%11/23
Match Corners > 9.552%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

57%12/21
30%7/23
Match Corners > 10.527%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

24%5/21

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2321/212321
2.61
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.86
13%3/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/21
14.74
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.57
84%16/19
Match Cards > 3.581%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

78%14/18
19/2318/21
63%12/19
Match Cards > 4.565%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

67%12/18
19/2318/21
61%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeVitoria at home · Fluminense on the road
1111
1.55
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.82
36%4/11
Win Rate27%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
18%2/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

55%6/11
1.27
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.18
1.09
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.73
27%3/11
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%3/11
64%7/11
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%5/11
55%6/11
Over 2.545%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

36%4/11
1.16
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.95
1.23
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.13