Serie A·
Regular Season - 11·06/01/2025·15:00
Santos
Santos
LWDLD
0-1
Finished
HT0-0
Botafogo
Botafogo
WLDWW
📍 Estádio Urbano Caldeira, Santos, São Paulo
Season statsSerie A
Santos10matchesBotafogo9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
49%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

65%
1509
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1678
46%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

64%
51%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

66%
1.38
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.91

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
109
0.80
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.33
20%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

33%
20%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
60%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
30%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

56%
40%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

56%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
109
0.80
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.11
60%
Scored > 0.552%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

44%
50%
Over 1.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

44%
40%
Over 2.531%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

22%
10%
Over 3.516%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

22%
40%
BTTS26%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

11%
0%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

0%
0%
Scored Both Halves22%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

44%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
109
1.10
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.56
12.40
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.78
4.30
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.44
3.30
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.78
77%
Save %79%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

81%
30%
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

56%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
109
1.22
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.12
1.04
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.03
0.19
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.09
-0.19
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.11
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.08

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
109
12.20
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.44
2.50
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.56
7.20
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.22
59%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

69%
20%
On-Target %27%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
7%
Shot Conversion7%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

8%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
109
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

49%
83%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

84%
387.70
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

427.00
0.04
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.06

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
109
30%3/10
Leading at HT32%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%3/9
50%5/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

33%3/9
20%2/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%3/9
40%4/10
HT/FT Same Outcome59%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

78%7/9
67%2/3
Led at HT → Won83%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%3/3
50%1/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered42%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/109/9109
0%
0-15'5%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
50%
16-30'35%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

20%
13%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

20%
13%
46-60'11%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

10%
0%
61-75'10%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

20%
25%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

20%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/109/9109
33%3/9
Scored First38%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

43%3/7
67%6/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

57%4/7
67%2/3
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

100%3/3
0%0/6
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/4
21'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

23'
55'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

28'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/109/9109
20%2/10
Scored after 75'21%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

22%2/9
50%5/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

0%0/9
100%2/2
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
20%2/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

11%1/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/109/9109
88%7/8
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%10/10
13%1/8
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/10
0%0/8
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/10
0%0/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/5
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/5

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
109
5.20
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.44
4.80
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.44
52%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
1.64
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.69
70%7/10
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%6/9
50%5/10
Match Corners > 9.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

44%4/9
30%3/10
Match Corners > 10.532%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

33%3/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/109/9109
2.80
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.44
10%1/10
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%1/9
14.40
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.00
80%8/10
Match Cards > 3.590%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%7/7
7/9
70%7/10
Match Cards > 4.585%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

100%7/7
7/9
59%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

74%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSantos at home · Botafogo on the road
45
1.25
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.40
25%1/4
Win Rate13%

Share of sampled matches won.

0%0/5
25%1/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

60%3/5
1.25
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.00
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.60
50%2/4
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%2/5
50%2/4
BTTS25%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

0%0/5
50%2/4
Over 2.525%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

0%0/5
1.87
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.74
1.08
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.15