Eliteserien·
Regular Season - 25·10/19/2025·08:30
Tromso
Tromso
LWWWW
1-3
Finished
HT1-1
Viking
Viking
WDWWD
📍 Romssa Arena, Tromsø
Season statsEliteserien
Tromso24matchesViking24matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Eliteserien.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
69%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

75%
1660
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1750
65%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

71%
73%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

79%
2.17
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.36

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2424
1.88
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.21
58%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

67%
13%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

21%
29%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

13%
33%
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%
17%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

4%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2424
1.58
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.42
83%
Scored > 0.590%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

96%
67%
Over 1.573%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
50%
Over 2.563%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%
38%
Over 3.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

58%
54%
BTTS63%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

71%
29%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

42%
38%
Scored Both Halves40%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

42%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2424
1.21
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.33
10.42
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.58
3.58
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.54
2.38
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.25
66%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

64%
33%
Clean Sheet31%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2424
1.90
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.60
1.22
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.41
0.68
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.19
-0.35
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.21
0.17
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2424
11.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

16.04
4.21
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.58
7.83
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.71
71%
Box Shot %69%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

67%
38%
On-Target %37%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
14%
Shot Conversion15%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

15%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2424
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

79%
488.79
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

430.83
0.00
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.02

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2424
50%12/24
Leading at HT48%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

46%11/24
38%9/24
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

21%5/24
13%3/24
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%8/24
50%12/24
HT/FT Same Outcome52%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

54%13/24
67%8/12
Led at HT → Won74%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

82%9/11
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered48%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

63%5/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 24/2424/242424
18%
0-15'17%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
8%
16-30'7%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
18%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
24%
46-60'21%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
11%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
21%
76-90+'22%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 24/2424/242424
65%15/23
Scored First63%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

61%14/23
35%8/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

39%9/23
73%11/15
Win when Scoring First80%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

86%12/14
38%3/8
Win when Conceding First41%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

44%4/9
34'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

20'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 24/2424/242424
29%7/24
Scored after 75'33%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%9/24
25%6/24
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

38%9/24
91%10/11
Lead Saved after 75'92%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

92%12/13
9%1/11
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

8%1/13
17%4/24
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

25%6/24

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 24/2424/242424
95%36/38
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

77%44/57
5%2/38
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

19%11/57
0%0/38
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

4%2/57
20%6/30
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

9%3/34
0%0/30
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

12%4/34

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2424
4.13
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

8.13
4.88
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.38
46%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

65%
-0.71
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

3.69
46%11/24
Match Corners > 8.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

75%18/24
46%11/24
Match Corners > 9.560%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

75%18/24
38%9/24
Match Corners > 10.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

63%15/24

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 24/2424/242424
1.79
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.71
8%2/24
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

4%1/24
12.79
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.38
75%15/20
Match Cards > 3.574%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

74%14/19
20/2419/24
50%10/20
Match Cards > 4.549%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

47%9/19
20/2419/24
56%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

64%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTromso at home · Viking on the road
1212
2.08
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.00
67%8/12
Win Rate63%

Share of sampled matches won.

58%7/12
25%3/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%2/12
1.50
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.33
0.83
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.58
42%5/12
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

17%2/12
50%6/12
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

83%10/12
50%6/12
Over 2.563%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

75%9/12
1.99
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.56
1.06
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.40