Allsvenskan·
Regular Season - 24·09/22/2025·13:00
IFK Varnamo
IFK Varnamo
LLLWW
1-2
Finished
HT1-0
Halmstad
Halmstad
DLWWL
📍 Finnvedsvallen, Värnamo
Season statsAllsvenskan
Varnamo23matchesHalmstad23matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Allsvenskan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
36%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

46%
1389
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1441
42%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

41%
29%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

50%
4.43
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.48

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2323
0.52
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.96
9%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

26%
26%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

17%
65%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

57%
9%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%
30%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

43%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2323
1.13
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.78
70%
Scored > 0.563%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

57%
74%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

70%
57%
Over 2.552%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

48%
48%
Over 3.539%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
65%
BTTS52%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

39%
4%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

9%
17%
Scored Both Halves13%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

9%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2323
2.04
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.87
16.39
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.96
5.91
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.09
3.83
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.22
65%
Save %64%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

63%
9%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2323
1.75
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.37
2.48
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.67
-0.73
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.30
-0.35
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.35
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2323
13.35
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.04
4.04
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.13
7.48
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.48
56%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

72%
30%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
8%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2323
46%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

40%
77%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

74%
390.26
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

345.96
-0.12
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.22

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2323
9%2/23
Leading at HT13%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

17%4/23
35%8/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%12/23
57%13/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%7/23
52%12/23
HT/FT Same Outcome54%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

57%13/23
0%0/2
Led at HT → Won38%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%3/4
23%3/13
Trailed at HT → Recovered12%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2323/232323
19%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

5%
11%
16-30'23%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

35%
7%
31-45'14%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

20%
19%
46-60'17%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

15%
22%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

10%
22%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

15%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2323/232323
27%6/22
Scored First36%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

45%10/22
73%16/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

55%12/22
33%2/6
Win when Scoring First47%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%6/10
0%0/16
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/12
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

38'
29'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

38'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2323/232323
26%6/23
Scored after 75'20%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

13%3/23
52%12/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

26%6/23
0%0/5
Lead Saved after 75'40%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
100%5/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
9%2/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

13%3/23

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2323/232323
93%25/27
Open-Play Share84%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

75%15/20
4%1/27
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

15%3/20
4%1/27
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

10%2/20
4%2/46
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

12%5/42
0%0/46
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

2%1/42

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2323
5.65
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.35
6.09
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.61
48%
Corner Share41%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

34%
-1.24
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.96
83%19/23
Match Corners > 8.572%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

61%14/23
74%17/23
Match Corners > 9.565%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

57%13/23
70%16/23
Match Corners > 10.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

43%10/23

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2323/232323
1.61
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.96
9%2/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

9%2/23
12.57
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.04
53%10/19
Match Cards > 3.559%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

65%13/20
19/2320/23
32%6/19
Match Cards > 4.536%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

40%8/20
19/2320/23
59%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeVarnamo at home · Halmstad on the road
1211
0.83
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.73
17%2/12
Win Rate17%

Share of sampled matches won.

18%2/11
50%6/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

64%7/11
1.25
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.55
1.92
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.82
17%2/12
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

9%1/11
75%9/12
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

36%4/11
67%8/12
Over 2.556%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
1.45
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.41
2.14
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.76