Allsvenskan·
Regular Season - 23·09/14/2025·10:30
Sirius
Sirius
LWWWW
3-0
Finished
HT1-0
Gais
Gais
WLWWL
📍 Studenternas IP, Uppsala
Season statsAllsvenskan
Sirius22matchesGais22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Allsvenskan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
62%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

62%
1541
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1591
51%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
73%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

57%
3.46
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.90

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
1.05
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.73
27%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

45%
23%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

36%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

18%
9%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%
14%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

27%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
1.45
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.50
86%
Scored > 0.580%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

73%
86%
Over 1.584%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

82%
64%
Over 2.555%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%
32%
Over 3.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

18%
77%
BTTS66%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%
18%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

27%
23%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

41%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
1.64
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.91
14.95
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.86
5.14
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.18
3.27
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.23
64%
Save %67%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
9%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
1.74
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.14
1.65
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.27
0.09
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.87
0.03
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.47
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
13.32
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

17.00
4.23
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.00
8.86
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.82
67%
Box Shot %62%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

58%
32%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
11%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

9%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
435.32
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

445.64
0.01
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.00

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
27%6/22
Leading at HT34%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

41%9/22
59%13/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

45%10/22
14%3/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

14%3/22
45%10/22
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%14/22
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won64%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

78%7/9
0%0/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
19%
0-15'21%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

22%
10%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
10%
31-45'8%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

6%
16%
46-60'13%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

9%
26%
61-75'24%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

22%
19%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
55%12/22
Scored First55%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

55%11/20
45%10/22
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

45%9/20
42%5/12
Win when Scoring First57%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
10%1/10
Win when Conceding First16%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

22%2/9
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

22'
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

42'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
27%6/22
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%7/22
32%7/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

27%6/22
80%4/5
Lead Saved after 75'90%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%8/8
20%1/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/8
9%2/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

9%2/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
90%28/31
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

94%30/32
10%3/31
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%2/32
0%0/31
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/32
8%3/37
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

5%1/21
3%1/37
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

5%1/21

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
5.09
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.50
6.32
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.18
45%
Corner Share53%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

61%
-1.47
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.89
86%19/22
Match Corners > 8.577%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

68%15/22
68%15/22
Match Corners > 9.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

59%13/22
59%13/22
Match Corners > 10.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

55%12/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
1.55
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.05
0%0/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/22
11.86
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

14.18
67%10/15
Match Cards > 3.570%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

74%14/19
15/2219/22
40%6/15
Match Cards > 4.546%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

53%10/19
15/2219/22
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeSirius at home · Gais on the road
1011
1.10
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.82
30%3/10
Win Rate38%

Share of sampled matches won.

45%5/11
50%5/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

9%1/11
1.20
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.73
1.30
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.91
10%1/10
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%3/11
60%6/10
BTTS62%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

64%7/11
50%5/10
Over 2.552%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

55%6/11
1.06
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.07
1.84
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.32