Allsvenskan·
Regular Season - 20·08/16/2025·09:00
Halmstad
Halmstad
LDLDL
0-4
Finished
HT0-3
Malmo FF
Malmo FF
LLDWW
📍 Örjans Vall, Halmstad
Season statsAllsvenskan
Halmstad19matchesFF19matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Allsvenskan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
33%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1430
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1660
34%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
31%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

36%
2.19
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.42

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1919
0.95
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.74
26%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

47%
16%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

32%
58%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

21%
26%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

42%
42%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1919
0.79
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.53
58%
Scored > 0.566%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
68%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

74%
47%
Over 2.547%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

47%
32%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
37%
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

47%
5%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

21%
5%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

37%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1919
1.89
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.89
15.42
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.42
5.16
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

2.68
3.21
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

1.79
62%
Save %64%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
26%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

42%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1919
0.98
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.72
1.62
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.63
-0.64
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.09
-0.15
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.12
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1919
8.79
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.21
2.95
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.68
6.16
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.00
70%
Box Shot %68%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
34%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

31%
9%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1919
39%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

59%
74%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
342.26
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

531.32
-0.23
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1919
11%2/19
Leading at HT29%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

47%9/19
58%11/19
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

47%9/19
32%6/19
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

5%1/19
58%11/19
HT/FT Same Outcome55%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

53%10/19
100%2/2
Led at HT → Won89%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

78%7/9
0%0/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%1/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 19/1919/191919
6%
0-15'12%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

17%
35%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
18%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
18%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

14%
12%
61-75'16%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

21%
12%
76-90+'16%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 19/1919/191919
44%8/18
Scored First57%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

69%11/16
56%10/18
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

31%5/16
63%5/8
Win when Scoring First68%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

73%8/11
0%0/10
Win when Conceding First10%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%1/5
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

26'
36'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

34'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 19/1919/191919
11%2/19
Scored after 75'21%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%6/19
26%5/19
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

21%4/19
80%4/5
Lead Saved after 75'79%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

78%7/9
20%1/5
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

22%2/9
16%3/19
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

5%1/19

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 19/1919/191919
82%14/17
Open-Play Share84%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

86%25/29
6%1/17
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%3/29
12%2/17
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

3%1/29
11%4/35
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%2/19
3%1/35
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

11%2/19

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1919
3.11
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.63
6.84
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.74
31%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

64%
-3.66
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.76
63%12/19
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

74%14/19
58%11/19
Match Corners > 9.561%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

63%12/19
42%8/19
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

37%7/19

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 19/1919/191919
1.68
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.95
11%2/19
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

5%1/19
14.05
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.79
63%10/16
Match Cards > 3.564%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

65%11/17
16/1917/19
38%6/16
Match Cards > 4.545%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

53%9/17
16/1917/19
66%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeHalmstad at home · FF on the road
1010
1.30
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.60
40%4/10
Win Rate40%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%4/10
50%5/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%2/10
1.10
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.30
1.80
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.90
40%4/10
Clean Sheet40%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%4/10
40%4/10
BTTS40%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%4/10
50%5/10
Over 2.540%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%3/10
1.31
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.92
1.19
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.80