Allsvenskan·
Regular Season - 19·08/09/2025·09:00
Malmo FF
Malmo FF
DWWWW
1-3
Finished
HT0-0
Mjallby AIF
Mjallby AIF
WWWWD
📍 Eleda Stadion, Malmö
Season statsAllsvenskan
FF18matchesAIF18matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Allsvenskan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
80%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

84%
1724
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1673
77%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

81%
82%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

87%
2.66
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.13

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1818
1.83
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.39
50%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

72%
33%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
17%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

6%
44%
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
28%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

0%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1818
1.56
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.94
72%
Scored > 0.586%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

100%
72%
Over 1.578%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

83%
44%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

56%
22%
Over 3.525%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

28%
44%
BTTS56%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%
22%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

39%
39%
Scored Both Halves33%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

28%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1818
0.78
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.78
11.33
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.50
2.56
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.67
1.78
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.78
70%
Save %73%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

76%
44%
Clean Sheet39%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1818
1.98
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.94
0.91
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.02
1.07
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.93
-0.20
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.08
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1818
15.06
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

13.94
4.61
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.78
9.89
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.72
66%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

63%
31%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
10%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1818
59%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

54%
85%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

83%
533.39
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

497.33
0.15
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.08

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1818
50%9/18
Leading at HT47%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%8/18
44%8/18
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%8/18
6%1/18
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

11%2/18
56%10/18
HT/FT Same Outcome47%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

39%7/18
78%7/9
Led at HT → Won76%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

75%6/8
100%1/1
Trailed at HT → Recovered100%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%2/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 18/1818/181818
18%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

12%
7%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

24%
21%
31-45'20%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

18%
14%
46-60'12%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

9%
18%
61-75'22%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

26%
21%
76-90+'17%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

12%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 18/1818/181818
73%11/15
Scored First73%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

72%13/18
27%4/15
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

28%5/18
73%8/11
Win when Scoring First75%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

77%10/13
25%1/4
Win when Conceding First43%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

60%3/5
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

29'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

35'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 18/1818/181818
33%6/18
Scored after 75'31%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

28%5/18
17%3/18
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

33%6/18
78%7/9
Lead Saved after 75'82%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%12/14
22%2/9
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%2/14
6%1/18
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%3/18

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 18/1818/181818
86%24/28
Open-Play Share93%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

100%34/34
11%3/28
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

0%0/34
4%1/28
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/34
13%2/16
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

6%1/16
13%2/16
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

6%1/16

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1818
6.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.11
3.78
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.17
63%
Corner Share56%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
1.66
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.35
72%13/18
Match Corners > 8.578%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

83%15/18
61%11/18
Match Corners > 9.564%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

67%12/18
33%6/18
Match Corners > 10.542%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%9/18

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 18/1818/181818
1.94
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.83
6%1/18
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/18
11.94
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.61
63%10/16
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

93%14/15
16/1815/18
50%8/16
Match Cards > 4.542%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

33%5/15
16/1815/18
63%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

68%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeFF at home · AIF on the road
89
2.12
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.22
63%5/8
Win Rate65%

Share of sampled matches won.

67%6/9
13%1/8
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

11%1/9
1.88
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.00
0.63
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
50%4/8
Clean Sheet36%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

22%2/9
50%4/8
BTTS64%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

78%7/9
63%5/8
Over 2.570%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

78%7/9
1.88
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.89
0.71
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.34