Damallsvenskan·
Regular Season - 22·10/11/2025·09:00
Häcken
Häcken
WWWWW
2-0
Finished
HT2-0
Hammarby
Hammarby
WWWLW
📍 Bravida Arena, Göteborg
Season statsDamallsvenskan
Häcken21matchesHammarby21matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Damallsvenskan.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
86%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

82%
1489
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1483
76%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

75%
96%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

89%
3.16
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.93

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2121
2.33
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.29
76%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

71%
5%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

14%
19%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

14%
48%
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

10%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2121
3.38
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.71
90%
Scored > 0.590%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

90%
90%
Over 1.586%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

81%
76%
Over 2.574%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

71%
67%
Over 3.557%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

48%
43%
BTTS45%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

48%
29%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

29%
62%
Scored Both Halves55%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

48%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2121
0.81
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.81
11.50
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9.50
2/214/21
1.00
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.50
2/214/21
0.50
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.50
2/214/21
50%
Save %61%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

71%
2/214/21
48%
Clean Sheet45%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

43%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2121
3.83
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

3.57
0.79
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.03
3.05
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

2.54
-0.58
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.62
0.14
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.24

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2121
26.50
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

16.50
2/214/21
7.50
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

7.00
2/214/21
15.00
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.75
2/214/21
57%
Box Shot %61%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
2/214/21
28%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

42%
2/214/21
8%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

15%
2/214/21

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2121
53%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

55%
2/214/21
82%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
2/214/21
459.00
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

486.75
2/214/21
0.05
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.07

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2121
57%12/21
Leading at HT60%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

62%13/21
33%7/21
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

24%5/21
10%2/21
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

14%3/21
67%14/21
HT/FT Same Outcome67%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

67%14/21
92%11/12
Led at HT → Won96%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%13/13
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered50%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

100%3/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 21/2121/212121
10%
0-15'13%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
13%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

12%
13%
31-45'18%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

23%
13%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

23%
22%
61-75'18%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
27%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

12%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 21/2121/212121
76%16/21
Scored First74%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

71%15/21
24%5/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

29%6/21
94%15/16
Win when Scoring First94%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

93%14/15
20%1/5
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%1/6
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

20'
19'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

29'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 21/2121/212121
62%13/21
Scored after 75'48%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

33%7/21
14%3/21
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

43%9/21
100%15/15
Lead Saved after 75'97%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

94%15/16
0%0/15
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

6%1/16
14%3/21
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

5%1/21

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 21/2121/212121
96%64/67
Open-Play Share97%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

98%56/57
4%3/67
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

2%1/57
0%0/67
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/57
18%4/22
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

6%1/17
18%4/22
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/17

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2121
5.50
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

8.75
2/214/21
2.50
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.00
2/214/21
69%
Corner Share69%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

69%
2/214/21
3.05
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.60
50%1/2
Match Corners > 8.575%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

100%4/4
2/214/21
0%0/2
Match Corners > 9.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

100%4/4
2/214/21
0%0/2
Match Corners > 10.538%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

75%3/4
2/214/21

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 21/2121/212121
1.00
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.00
2/214/21
0%0/2
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/4
2/214/21
10.50
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

9.50
2/214/21
38%6/16
Match Cards > 3.534%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

31%4/13
16/2113/21
13%2/16
Match Cards > 4.56%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

0%0/13
16/2113/21
54%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

76%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeHäcken at home · Hammarby on the road
1010
2.20
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.50
70%7/10
Win Rate55%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%4/10
20%2/10
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%3/10
3.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.70
1.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.10
20%2/10
Clean Sheet25%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

30%3/10
80%8/10
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%5/10
90%9/10
Over 2.580%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%7/10
4.19
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

3.51
1.12
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.26