Major League Soccer·
Regular Season - 26·08/09/2025·20:30
Austin
Austin
WWDDL
2-2
Finished
HT2-0
Houston Dynamo
Houston Dynamo
LLLDL
📍 Q2 Stadium, Austin, Texas
Season statsMajor League Soccer
Austin23matchesDynamo24matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Major League Soccer.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
65%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

23%
1550
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1406
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

35%
73%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

10%
2.56
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.94

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2324
1.43
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.12
39%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
26%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

25%
35%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

46%
35%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%
39%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

21%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2324
0.91
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
61%
Scored > 0.570%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

79%
61%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

79%
30%
Over 2.542%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

54%
9%
Over 3.523%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

38%
39%
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

54%
17%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

4%
13%
Scored Both Halves17%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

21%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2324
1.13
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.63
13.00
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.25
4.61
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.25
3.61
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.63
78%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

62%
35%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2324
1.52
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.23
1.47
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.87
0.05
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.64
-0.24
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.09
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.10

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2324
11.91
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.00
3.70
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.50
7.83
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.75
66%
Box Shot %65%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

65%
31%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
8%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

10%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2324
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

53%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

85%
406.43
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

479.00
-0.05
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.08

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2324
22%5/23
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

33%8/24
52%12/23
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

42%10/24
26%6/23
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

25%6/24
70%16/23
HT/FT Same Outcome60%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%12/24
100%5/5
Led at HT → Won69%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

38%3/8
17%1/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered8%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 23/2324/242324
17%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

10%
22%
16-30'14%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

7%
13%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

24%
17%
46-60'14%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

10%
9%
61-75'11%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

14%
22%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

34%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 23/2324/242324
55%11/20
Scored First50%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

45%10/22
45%9/20
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

55%12/22
82%9/11
Win when Scoring First66%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

50%5/10
0%0/9
Win when Conceding First8%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

17%2/12
32'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

41'
42'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

21'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 23/2324/242324
22%5/23
Scored after 75'30%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

38%9/24
39%9/23
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

25%6/24
88%7/8
Lead Saved after 75'94%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%5/5
13%1/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/5
17%4/23
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

17%4/24

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 23/2324/242324
83%19/23
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

90%26/29
9%2/23
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

10%3/29
9%2/23
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/29
12%3/26
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%1/40
4%1/26
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

3%1/40

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2324
4.70
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.08
5.57
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.21
46%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

49%
-0.97
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.07
74%17/23
Match Corners > 8.568%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

63%15/24
61%14/23
Match Corners > 9.558%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

54%13/24
48%11/23
Match Corners > 10.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

46%11/24

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 23/2324/242324
2.17
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.67
4%1/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

8%2/24
13.30
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

15.21
73%16/22
Match Cards > 3.584%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

96%22/23
22/2323/24
50%11/22
Match Cards > 4.568%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

87%20/23
22/2323/24
73%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeAustin at home · Dynamo on the road
1111
1.55
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.18
36%4/11
Win Rate32%

Share of sampled matches won.

27%3/11
18%2/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%4/11
0.73
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.36
0.73
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.45
45%5/11
Clean Sheet41%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%4/11
36%4/11
BTTS41%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

45%5/11
27%3/11
Over 2.536%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

45%5/11
1.85
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.11
1.20
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.89