UEFA Europa Conference League·
3rd Qualifying Round·08/15/2024·15:00
Dečić
Dečić
LDDWD
2-1
Penalties
HT1-1PEN3-4AET0-0
HJK helsinki
HJK helsinki
WLWWD
📍 Stadion Kraj Bistrice, Nikšić

Stats below use each team's main league —First LeagueMontenegro·VeikkausliigaFinland

Last 10UEFA Europa Conference League
Dečić10matcheshelsinki10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
48%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

62%
1491
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1490
48%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

62%
47%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

61%
1.64
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.41

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
0.90
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.70
20%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

50%
30%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

30%
20%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%
60%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
0.70
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.30
40%
Scored > 0.555%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
70%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

80%
20%
Over 2.540%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

60%
10%
Over 3.510%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

10%
30%
BTTS35%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%
10%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

20%
11%
Scored Both Halves21%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

30%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
1.20
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.10
20%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
1.51
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.99
0.96
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.25
0.55
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.74
-0.31
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.37
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.22

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.11

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
11%1/9
Leading at HT16%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

20%2/10
33%3/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%5/10
56%5/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%3/10
56%5/9
HT/FT Same Outcome58%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%6/10
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won100%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

100%2/2
40%2/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered37%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/1010/101010
0%
0-15'0%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

0%
14%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

17%
14%
31-45'15%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

17%
29%
46-60'23%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

17%
43%
61-75'34%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

25%
0%
76-90+'13%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

25%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/1010/101010
25%2/8
Scored First40%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

56%5/9
75%6/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

44%4/9
100%2/2
Win when Scoring First80%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%3/5
0%0/6
Win when Conceding First25%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%2/4
45'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

37'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

16'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/1010/101010
0%0/9
Scored after 75'5%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

10%1/10
0%0/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

10%1/10
100%2/2
Lead Saved after 75'100%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

100%3/3
0%0/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

0%0/3
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%1/10

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/1010/101010
100%7/7
Open-Play Share96%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%11/12
0%0/7
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/12
0%0/7
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/12
9%1/11
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%1/12
0%0/11
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%1/12

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.78

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/1010/101010
67%4/6
Match Cards > 3.577%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

88%7/8
6/108/10
50%3/6
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

63%5/8
6/108/10
62%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

77%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeDečić at home · helsinki on the road
35
1.67
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.80
33%1/3
Win Rate27%

Share of sampled matches won.

20%1/5
0%0/3
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

60%3/5
1.33
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.60
0.67
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.80
33%1/3
Clean Sheet27%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

20%1/5
67%2/3
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%2/5
33%1/3
Over 2.557%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

80%4/5
1.68
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.66
0.79
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.03