Super League 1·
Regular Season - 10·11/04/2024·10:30
Asteras Tripolis
Asteras Tripolis
WWDDW
3-0
Finished
HT0-0
OFI
OFI
WWLWL
📍 Stadio Theodoros Kolokotronis, Tripoli
Season statsSuper League 1
Tripolis9matchesOFI9matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Super League 1.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
69%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1507
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1527
57%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
80%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

66%
1.61
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.11

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
99
1.44
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.56
33%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

44%
44%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

22%
22%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

33%
33%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%
22%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

22%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
99
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.56
78%
Scored > 0.578%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

78%
56%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

89%
22%
Over 2.544%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

67%
11%
Over 3.522%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

33%
56%
BTTS67%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

78%
11%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

44%
11%
Scored Both Halves22%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

33%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
99
0.78
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.56
11.78
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.78
2.78
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.11
2.22
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.56
80%
Save %71%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

62%
33%
Clean Sheet17%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
99
1.26
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.00
1.13
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.69
0.13
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.31
-0.20
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.39
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
99
11.00
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

10.00
3.67
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.78
6.56
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

5.78
60%
Box Shot %59%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

58%
33%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

38%
9%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

16%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
99
51%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

41%
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

75%
416.56
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

313.67
0.00
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.07

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
99
11%1/9
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

44%4/9
67%6/9
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

22%2/9
22%2/9
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

33%3/9
78%7/9
HT/FT Same Outcome67%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

56%5/9
100%1/1
Led at HT → Won75%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

50%2/4
0%0/2
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

33%1/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 9/99/999
10%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

20%
30%
16-30'25%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

20%
20%
31-45'10%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

0%
10%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

20%
10%
61-75'5%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

0%
20%
76-90+'30%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

40%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 9/99/999
63%5/8
Scored First59%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

56%5/9
38%3/8
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

44%4/9
60%3/5
Win when Scoring First60%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

60%3/5
0%0/3
Win when Conceding First13%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

25%1/4
26'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

13'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

25'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 9/99/999
22%2/9
Scored after 75'39%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

56%5/9
0%0/9
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

44%4/9
75%3/4
Lead Saved after 75'71%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

67%2/3
25%1/4
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

33%1/3
0%0/9
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

22%2/9

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 9/99/999
80%8/10
Open-Play Share80%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

80%12/15
10%1/10
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%2/15
10%1/10
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%1/15
17%1/6
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

15%2/13
0%0/6
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/13

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
99
4.44
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.11
3.56
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.00
56%
Corner Share47%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

38%
0.31
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.78
44%4/9
Match Corners > 8.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

33%3/9
44%4/9
Match Corners > 9.533%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

22%2/9
33%3/9
Match Corners > 10.528%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

22%2/9

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 9/99/999
3.11
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

3.22
22%2/9
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

11%1/9
14.11
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

16.56
100%9/9
Match Cards > 3.5100%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%9/9
100%9/9
Match Cards > 4.5100%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

100%9/9
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

70%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeTripolis at home · OFI on the road
45
1.00
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

2.00
25%1/4
Win Rate43%

Share of sampled matches won.

60%3/5
50%2/4
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%1/5
0.75
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.80
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.60
25%1/4
Clean Sheet13%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

0%0/5
50%2/4
BTTS65%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

80%4/5
25%1/4
Over 2.553%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

80%4/5
1.25
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.57
1.73
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.19