Serie B·
Regular Season - 26·02/16/2025·11:15
Cesena
Cesena
WLDWD
1-1
Finished
HT0-1
Pisa
Pisa
LWWDW
📍 Orogel Stadium-Dino Manuzzi, Cesena
Season statsSerie B
Cesena25matchesPisa25matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie B.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
50%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

68%
1504
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1562
44%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

68%
56%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

67%
2.46
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

1.75

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2525
1.32
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.04
36%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

60%
24%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

24%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

16%
28%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%
24%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

28%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2525
1.32
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.56
76%
Scored > 0.574%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

72%
72%
Over 1.570%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
44%
Over 2.548%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

52%
24%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

28%
56%
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

52%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

40%
32%
Scored Both Halves40%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

48%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2525
1.36
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.88
10.65
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

11.20
23/25
3.74
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.04
23/25
2.45
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.12
22/25
63%
Save %70%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

77%
23/25
28%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

32%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2525
1.39
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.64
1.77
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.97
-0.38
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.67
-0.18
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.23
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2525
12.48
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.76
23/25
4.83
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.36
23/25
7.70
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

9.20
23/25
62%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

72%
23/25
39%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

26%
23/25
10%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%
23/25

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2525
50%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
23/25
81%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

72%
23/25
433.00
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

325.80
23/25
-0.03
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2525
28%7/25
Leading at HT38%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

48%12/25
44%11/25
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

44%11/25
28%7/25
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

8%2/25
60%15/25
HT/FT Same Outcome62%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%16/25
71%5/7
Led at HT → Won82%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

92%11/12
14%1/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered32%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

50%1/2

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 25/2525/252525
20%
0-15'19%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

19%
11%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

19%
20%
31-45'19%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

19%
23%
46-60'20%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
17%
61-75'17%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

16%
9%
76-90+'10%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

11%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 25/2525/252525
43%10/23
Scored First56%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

68%15/22
57%13/23
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

32%7/22
80%8/10
Win when Scoring First83%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

87%13/15
8%1/13
Win when Conceding First18%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

29%2/7
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

42'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 25/2525/252525
12%3/25
Scored after 75'14%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

16%4/25
16%4/25
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

28%7/25
82%9/11
Lead Saved after 75'87%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

92%12/13
18%2/11
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

8%1/13
4%1/25
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

8%2/25

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 25/2525/252525
74%26/35
Open-Play Share83%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

92%34/37
17%6/35
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%3/37
9%3/35
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/37
3%1/32
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

4%1/24
3%1/32
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%2/24

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2525
4.65
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.96
23/25
3.65
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.36
23/25
56%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

48%
23/25
0.70
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.05
39%9/23
Match Corners > 8.542%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

44%11/25
23/25
35%8/23
Match Corners > 9.531%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

28%7/25
23/25
35%8/23
Match Corners > 10.527%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

20%5/25
23/25

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 25/2525/252525
2.78
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.04
23/25
13%3/23
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%3/25
23/25
14.87
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

16.84
23/25
92%23/25
Match Cards > 3.589%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

87%20/23
23/25
76%19/25
Match Cards > 4.564%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

52%12/23
23/25
65%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

66%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeCesena at home · Pisa on the road
1212
1.83
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.75
50%6/12
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

50%6/12
17%2/12
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

25%3/12
1.67
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.25
1.17
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
33%4/12
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%3/12
58%7/12
BTTS54%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%6/12
42%5/12
Over 2.542%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

42%5/12
1.86
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.48
1.18
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.21