Serie A·
Regular Season - 38·05/23/2025·14:45
Como
Como
DWWWW
0-2
Finished
HT0-1
Inter
Inter
DWDWD
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Como
Season statsSerie A
Como37matchesInter37matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
74%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

63%
1691
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1890
67%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

60%
80%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

65%
2.13
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.38

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3737
1.32
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.11
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

62%
27%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

24%
38%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

14%
19%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%
19%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

11%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3737
1.32
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.08
81%
Scored > 0.585%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

89%
84%
Over 1.581%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

78%
46%
Over 2.551%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%
24%
Over 3.532%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

41%
62%
BTTS55%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

49%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

22%
22%
Scored Both Halves30%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

38%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3737
1.35
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.95
10.05
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.11
3.81
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.35
2.43
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.46
64%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

73%
19%
Clean Sheet30%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

41%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3737
1.23
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.53
1.22
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.48
0.01
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.05
0.25
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.21
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.12

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3737
13.62
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

14.92
4.73
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.95
8.65
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

10.51
63%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

70%
35%
On-Target %34%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

33%
10%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3737
55%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

60%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

88%
465.54
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

534.27
0.14
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.08

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3737
38%14/37
Leading at HT43%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

49%18/37
38%14/37
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

43%16/37
24%9/37
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

8%3/37
41%15/37
HT/FT Same Outcome43%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

46%17/37
50%7/14
Led at HT → Won61%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

72%13/18
44%4/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered56%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

67%2/3

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 37/3737/373737
2%
0-15'8%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

13%
9%
16-30'12%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

15%
32%
31-45'26%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

20%
25%
46-60'25%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

24%
9%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

9%
23%
76-90+'21%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

19%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 37/3737/373737
49%18/37
Scored First57%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

65%24/37
51%19/37
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

35%13/37
50%9/18
Win when Scoring First67%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

83%20/24
21%4/19
Win when Conceding First22%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

23%3/13
44'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

32'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

39'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 37/3737/373737
22%8/37
Scored after 75'27%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%12/37
43%16/37
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%12/37
75%9/12
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

91%20/22
25%3/12
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

9%2/22
27%10/37
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

11%4/37

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 37/3737/373737
100%44/44
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

88%66/75
0%0/44
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

11%8/75
0%0/44
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

1%1/75
13%7/55
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%3/37
9%5/55
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%3/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3737
4.49
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.68
3.86
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.73
54%
Corner Share57%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

60%
0.78
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-0.23
49%18/37
Match Corners > 8.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

51%19/37
41%15/37
Match Corners > 9.542%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

43%16/37
24%9/37
Match Corners > 10.531%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

38%14/37

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 37/3737/373737
2.32
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.43
16%6/37
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

3%1/37
13.32
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.81
80%28/35
Match Cards > 3.569%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

58%15/26
35/3726/37
57%20/35
Match Cards > 4.540%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

23%6/26
35/3726/37
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

63%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeComo at home · Inter on the road
1818
1.61
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.94
44%8/18
Win Rate50%

Share of sampled matches won.

56%10/18
28%5/18
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

17%3/18
1.56
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.06
1.33
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.78
22%4/18
Clean Sheet36%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%9/18
72%13/18
BTTS53%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%6/18
50%9/18
Over 2.550%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%9/18
1.36
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.49
1.15
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.13