Serie A·
Regular Season - 32·04/13/2025·12:00
Como
Como
WDLDL
1-0
Finished
HT1-0
Torino
Torino
DDWDW
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Como
Season statsSerie A
Como31matchesTorino31matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
51%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

67%
1618
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1655
48%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

63%
54%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

71%
2.78
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.23

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3131
1.06
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.29
26%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

29%
29%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

42%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

29%
10%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%
23%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

26%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3131
1.26
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.16
77%
Scored > 0.576%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

74%
90%
Over 1.579%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

68%
48%
Over 2.540%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

32%
26%
Over 3.526%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

26%
68%
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

55%
16%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

10%
19%
Scored Both Halves26%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

32%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3131
1.55
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.16
9.87
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

14.58
3.87
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.74
2.32
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.77
30/31
60%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

77%
10%
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3131
1.25
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

0.79
1.08
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.32
0.16
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.53
0.13
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

0.41
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.08

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3131
13.58
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.68
4.71
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.45
8.68
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.00
64%
Box Shot %63%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

62%
35%
On-Target %35%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

36%
9%
Shot Conversion11%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

12%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3131
54%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

48%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

81%
461.16
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

408.55
0.10
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.05

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3131
32%10/31
Leading at HT27%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

23%7/31
39%12/31
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

52%16/31
29%9/31
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

26%8/31
39%12/31
HT/FT Same Outcome48%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

58%18/31
40%4/10
Led at HT → Won49%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

57%4/7
44%4/9
Trailed at HT → Recovered35%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

25%2/8

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 31/3131/313131
3%
0-15'4%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

6%
9%
16-30'6%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

3%
29%
31-45'26%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

22%
29%
46-60'20%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

11%
12%
61-75'24%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

36%
18%
76-90+'20%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 31/3131/313131
42%13/31
Scored First39%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

36%10/28
58%18/31
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

64%18/28
38%5/13
Win when Scoring First54%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

70%7/10
17%3/18
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

11%2/18
43'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

50'
27'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

31'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 31/3131/313131
16%5/31
Scored after 75'23%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

29%9/31
52%16/31
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

19%6/31
63%5/8
Lead Saved after 75'69%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

75%6/8
38%3/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

25%2/8
29%9/31
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%3/31

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 31/3131/313131
100%34/34
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

89%32/36
0%0/34
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

6%2/36
0%0/34
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

6%2/36
13%7/53
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

3%1/37
9%5/53
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

8%3/37

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3131
4.32
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.90
3.74
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.48
54%
Corner Share48%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

42%
0.78
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.60
42%13/31
Match Corners > 8.550%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

58%18/31
35%11/31
Match Corners > 9.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

52%16/31
23%7/31
Match Corners > 10.527%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

32%10/31

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 31/3131/313131
2.35
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.19
19%6/31
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

10%3/31
13.48
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.87
83%24/29
Match Cards > 3.582%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

82%23/28
29/3128/31
62%18/29
Match Cards > 4.556%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

50%14/28
29/3128/31
71%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

69%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeComo at home · Torino on the road
1516
1.33
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.19
33%5/15
Win Rate29%

Share of sampled matches won.

25%4/16
33%5/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

31%5/16
1.53
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.38
1.53
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.44
13%2/15
Clean Sheet19%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%4/16
80%12/15
BTTS71%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

63%10/16
53%8/15
Over 2.549%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%7/16
1.29
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.80
1.18
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.50