Serie A·
Regular Season - 18·12/30/2024·12:30
Como
Como
LWDDL
2-0
Finished
HT0-0
Lecce
Lecce
LWLDW
📍 Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, Como
Season statsSerie A
Como17matchesLecce17matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Serie A.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
45%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

46%
1530
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1472
38%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

44%
51%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

47%
2.30
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.72

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1717
0.88
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

0.94
18%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

24%
35%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

24%
47%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

53%
6%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

24%
35%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

47%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1717
1.06
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.65
65%
Scored > 0.559%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

53%
82%
Over 1.571%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

59%
41%
Over 2.541%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

41%
35%
Over 3.529%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

24%
59%
BTTS47%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

35%
12%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

6%
12%
Scored Both Halves9%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

6%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1717
1.76
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.71
9.82
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

15.06
4.12
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

5.06
2.35
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.35
57%
Save %62%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

66%
6%
Clean Sheet15%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

24%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1717
1.20
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.06
1.13
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.51
0.07
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.46
-0.03
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.31
0.09
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.09

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1717
14.12
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.94
4.41
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.47
8.59
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.71
61%
Box Shot %58%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

56%
31%
On-Target %30%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

29%
8%
Shot Conversion6%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

5%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1717
54%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

42%
84%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

80%
462.24
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

349.71
0.08
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.13

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1717
24%4/17
Leading at HT21%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

18%3/17
35%6/17
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

47%8/17
41%7/17
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

35%6/17
35%6/17
HT/FT Same Outcome44%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

53%9/17
25%1/4
Led at HT → Won46%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%2/3
43%3/7
Trailed at HT → Recovered30%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

17%1/6

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 17/1717/171717
0%
0-15'4%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
7%
16-30'8%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

8%
27%
31-45'30%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

33%
40%
46-60'33%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

25%
7%
61-75'8%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

8%
20%
76-90+'18%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

17%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 17/1717/171717
24%4/17
Scored First27%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

31%5/16
76%13/17
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

69%11/16
50%2/4
Win when Scoring First65%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

80%4/5
8%1/13
Win when Conceding First4%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/11
47'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

36'
30'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

45'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 17/1717/171717
12%2/17
Scored after 75'12%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

12%2/17
53%9/17
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%5/17
50%1/2
Lead Saved after 75'65%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

80%4/5
50%1/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

20%1/5
47%8/17
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

12%2/17

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 17/1717/171717
100%15/15
Open-Play Share92%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

83%10/12
0%0/15
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

8%1/12
0%0/15
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

8%1/12
15%5/33
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

11%3/28
9%3/33
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/28

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1717
4.82
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.59
4.24
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

6.76
53%
Corner Share44%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

35%
0.69
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-2.43
53%9/17
Match Corners > 8.559%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

65%11/17
47%8/17
Match Corners > 9.544%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

41%7/17
35%6/17
Match Corners > 10.535%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

35%6/17

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 17/1717/171717
2.18
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.76
12%2/17
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

24%4/17
12.88
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.59
73%11/15
Match Cards > 3.580%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

87%13/15
15/1715/17
47%7/15
Match Cards > 4.563%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

80%12/15
15/1715/17
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

61%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeComo at home · Lecce on the road
78
1.29
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.50
29%2/7
Win Rate21%

Share of sampled matches won.

13%1/8
29%2/7
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

75%6/8
1.43
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.25
1.86
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.50
14%1/7
Clean Sheet20%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

25%2/8
71%5/7
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

13%1/8
43%3/7
Over 2.534%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

25%2/8
1.64
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

0.89
1.13
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.63