World Cup - Qualification Asia·
3rd Round - 5·11/14/2024·11:15
Iraq
Iraq
LWDWW
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Jordan
Jordan
WLWDW
📍 Basra International Stadium, Basra
Last 10World Cup - Qualification Asia
Iraq10matchesJordan10matches

Not in either team's main domestic league — every panel below reflects each team's most recent matches across all competitions.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
65%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

68%
1608
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1616
70%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

71%
59%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

64%
2.41
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.94

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1010
2.20
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

2.30
70%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

70%
10%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
20%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

10%
60%
Clean Sheet55%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%
10%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

20%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1010
2.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.50
90%
Scored > 0.585%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

80%
60%
Over 1.575%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

90%
50%
Over 2.560%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

70%
50%
Over 3.540%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

30%
40%
BTTS40%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

40%
20%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

30%
20%
Scored Both Halves35%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

50%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1010
0.90
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.60
8.57
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

9.00
7/106/10
3.43
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.33
7/106/10
2.67
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.50
6/106/10
67%
Save %71%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

75%
7/106/10
60%
Clean Sheet55%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

50%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1010
2.37
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.80
1.03
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.06
1.34
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

1.75
-0.34
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.49
0.22
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.19

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1010
11.14
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

15.83
7/106/10
2.86
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

5.00
7/106/10
7.71
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.80
7/105/10
69%
Box Shot %58%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

46%
7/106/10
26%
On-Target %29%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
7/106/10
14%
Shot Conversion14%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%
7/106/10

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1010
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
7/106/10
80%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

78%
7/105/10
383.71
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

311.60
7/105/10
-0.08
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.12

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1010
40%4/10
Leading at HT45%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

50%5/10
30%3/10
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

40%4/10
30%3/10
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

10%1/10
70%7/10
HT/FT Same Outcome65%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

60%6/10
100%4/4
Led at HT → Won90%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

80%4/5
33%1/3
Trailed at HT → Recovered17%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

0%0/1

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 10/108/101010
15%
0-15'18%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

22%
5%
16-30'9%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

13%
10%
31-45'7%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

4%
15%
46-60'18%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

22%
20%
61-75'19%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

17%
35%
76-90+'28%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

22%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 10/108/101010
67%6/9
Scored First71%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

75%6/8
33%3/9
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

25%2/8
100%6/6
Win when Scoring First92%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

83%5/6
33%1/3
Win when Conceding First42%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

50%1/2
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

19'
43'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

27'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 10/108/101010
70%7/10
Scored after 75'60%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

50%4/8
40%4/10
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

13%1/8
100%6/6
Lead Saved after 75'93%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%6/7
0%0/6
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%1/7
40%4/10
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

25%2/8

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 10/108/101010
85%17/20
Open-Play Share86%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%20/23
15%3/20
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%3/23
0%0/20
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/23
0%0/9
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

20%1/5
0%0/9
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/5

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1010
4.71
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

6.17
7/106/10
3.71
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.17
7/106/10
56%
Corner Share61%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

66%
7/106/10
-0.06
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

2.25
57%4/7
Match Corners > 8.562%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

67%4/6
7/106/10
29%2/7
Match Corners > 9.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

67%4/6
7/106/10
29%2/7
Match Corners > 10.539%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

50%3/6
7/106/10

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 10/108/101010
1.43
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

0.86
7/107/10
29%2/7
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

0%0/7
7/107/10
10.57
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

10.00
7/107/10
75%6/8
Match Cards > 3.563%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

50%3/6
8/106/10
50%4/8
Match Cards > 4.525%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

0%0/6
8/106/10
55%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeIraq at home · Jordan on the road
63
2.50
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

3.00
83%5/6
Win Rate92%

Share of sampled matches won.

100%3/3
17%1/6
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

0%0/3
1.83
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

2.67
1.00
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.67
50%3/6
Clean Sheet42%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

33%1/3
50%3/6
BTTS58%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

67%2/3
50%3/6
Over 2.575%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

100%3/3
2.46
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

2.95
1.06
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.86