Segunda División·
Regular Season - 31·03/16/2025·09:00
Eldense
Eldense
WLWWD
2-2
Finished
HT0-0
Mirandes
Mirandes
WWLWD
📍 Estadio Municipal Nuevo Pepico Amat, Elda
Season statsSegunda División
Eldense30matchesMirandes30matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Segunda División.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
57%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

69%
1432
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1545
49%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

66%
66%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

72%
2.68
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.06

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
3030
1.13
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.80
30%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

53%
23%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

20%
47%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

27%
30%
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

47%
33%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

30%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
3030
1.07
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.30
67%
Scored > 0.568%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

70%
67%
Over 1.557%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

47%
50%
Over 2.542%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

33%
27%
Over 3.527%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

27%
50%
BTTS42%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

33%
13%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

17%
17%
Scored Both Halves20%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

23%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
3030
1.43
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.77
13.87
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

10.93
4.17
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.27
2.77
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.30
66%
Save %68%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

70%
30%
Clean Sheet38%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

47%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
3030
1.38
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.80
1.66
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

0.93
-0.28
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.86
-0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.34
0.11
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
3030
12.70
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

11.33
3.87
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.80
8.23
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.07
65%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

62%
30%
On-Target %32%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

34%
8%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
3030
45%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

43%
75%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

73%
328.63
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

336.10
-0.13
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.15

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
3030
20%6/30
Leading at HT30%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

40%12/30
53%16/30
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

37%11/30
27%8/30
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

23%7/30
60%18/30
HT/FT Same Outcome63%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

67%20/30
50%3/6
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

83%10/12
0%0/8
Trailed at HT → Recovered7%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

14%1/7

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 30/3030/303030
9%
0-15'9%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

8%
16%
16-30'21%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

26%
19%
31-45'17%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

15%
19%
46-60'16%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

13%
13%
61-75'15%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

18%
25%
76-90+'23%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

21%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 30/3030/303030
54%14/26
Scored First58%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

63%17/27
46%12/26
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

37%10/27
57%8/14
Win when Scoring First70%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

82%14/17
8%1/12
Win when Conceding First14%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

20%2/10
40'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

36'
39'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

37'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 30/3030/303030
23%7/30
Scored after 75'23%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

23%7/30
33%10/30
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

17%5/30
86%6/7
Lead Saved after 75'86%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

86%12/14
14%1/7
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

14%2/14
20%6/30
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

10%3/30

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 30/3030/303030
91%29/32
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%34/39
9%3/32
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%5/39
0%0/32
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/39
12%5/43
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

0%0/23
0%0/43
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/23

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
3030
5.23
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

4.47
4.63
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

4.23
53%
Corner Share52%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

51%
0.79
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.29
63%19/30
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%15/30
47%14/30
Match Corners > 9.542%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

37%11/30
40%12/30
Match Corners > 10.532%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

23%7/30

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 30/3030/303030
2.60
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.10
13%4/30
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

13%4/30
12.93
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

13.17
75%21/28
Match Cards > 3.582%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

89%25/28
28/3028/30
61%17/28
Match Cards > 4.566%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

71%20/28
28/3028/30
70%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

62%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeEldense at home · Mirandes on the road
1514
1.20
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.07
33%5/15
Win Rate31%

Share of sampled matches won.

29%4/14
47%7/15
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

50%7/14
1.20
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.86
1.53
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.00
33%5/15
Clean Sheet35%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

36%5/14
60%9/15
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

29%4/14
60%9/15
Over 2.544%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%4/14
1.16
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.06
1.97
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.26