Segunda División·
Regular Season - 13·11/20/2024·14:00
Eldense
Eldense
WLWLL
2-1
Finished
HT1-0
Huesca
Huesca
LDWDL
📍 Estadio Municipal Nuevo Pepico Amat, Elda
Season statsSegunda División
Eldense14matchesHuesca14matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in Segunda División.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
51%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

52%
1433
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1501
45%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

54%
57%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

50%
2.76
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.18

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
1414
1.07
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.36
29%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

36%
21%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

29%
50%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

36%
21%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%
21%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

36%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
1414
1.21
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.36
79%
Scored > 0.571%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

64%
79%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

57%
50%
Over 2.550%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

50%
29%
Over 3.532%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

36%
64%
BTTS61%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

57%
14%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

29%
21%
Scored Both Halves32%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

43%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
1414
1.50
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.07
14.79
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.29
4.86
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

3.71
3.29
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

3.00
13/14
68%
Save %71%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

75%
21%
Clean Sheet18%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
1414
1.41
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.47
1.64
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.19
-0.24
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.28
-0.27
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.25
0.12
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.15

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
1414
12.07
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

9.64
4.57
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.36
7.79
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

6.21
65%
Box Shot %64%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

64%
38%
On-Target %36%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

35%
10%
Shot Conversion12%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

14%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
1414
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

44%
75%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

77%
339.64
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

351.36
-0.08
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.10

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
1414
21%3/14
Leading at HT32%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

43%6/14
43%6/14
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

21%3/14
36%5/14
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

36%5/14
71%10/14
HT/FT Same Outcome68%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

64%9/14
67%2/3
Led at HT → Won67%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

67%4/6
0%0/5
Trailed at HT → Recovered10%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

20%1/5

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 14/1414/141414
12%
0-15'11%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

11%
29%
16-30'25%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

21%
12%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

21%
24%
46-60'20%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
12%
61-75'9%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

5%
12%
76-90+'19%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

26%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 14/1414/141414
62%8/13
Scored First65%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

69%9/13
38%5/13
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

31%4/13
50%4/8
Win when Scoring First53%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

56%5/9
0%0/5
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/4
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

35'
31'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

34'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 14/1414/141414
14%2/14
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

36%5/14
29%4/14
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

29%4/14
100%2/2
Lead Saved after 75'80%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

60%3/5
0%0/2
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

40%2/5
7%1/14
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

14%2/14

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 14/1414/141414
88%15/17
Open-Play Share81%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

74%14/19
12%2/17
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

21%4/19
0%0/17
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

5%1/19
14%3/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

7%1/15
0%0/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

7%1/15

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
1414
5.21
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

3.36
4.79
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.36
52%
Corner Share45%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

39%
-0.12
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

-1.25
64%9/14
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

50%7/14
50%7/14
Match Corners > 9.543%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

36%5/14
36%5/14
Match Corners > 10.532%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

29%4/14

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 14/1414/141414
2.64
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

3.07
21%3/14
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

21%3/14
10.93
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

12.29
62%8/13
Match Cards > 3.581%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

100%12/12
13/1412/14
54%7/13
Match Cards > 4.569%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

83%10/12
13/1412/14
65%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

56%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeEldense at home · Huesca on the road
77
1.43
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.00
43%3/7
Win Rate36%

Share of sampled matches won.

29%2/7
43%3/7
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

57%4/7
1.57
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.71
1.43
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.86
29%2/7
Clean Sheet29%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

29%2/7
71%5/7
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

29%2/7
57%4/7
Over 2.543%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

29%2/7
1.51
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.13
1.49
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

0.83