League Two·
Regular Season - 44·04/21/2025·10:00
Barrow
Barrow
DWWDL
0-0
Finished
HT0-0
Tranmere
Tranmere
LDWLW
📍 SO Legal Stadium, Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria
Season statsLeague Two
Barrow43matchesTranmere43matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
71%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

57%
1422
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1382
64%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

58%
78%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

56%
1.82
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

3.34

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
4343
1.30
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.02
35%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

23%
26%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

33%
40%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

44%
28%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%
35%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

40%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
4343
1.14
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.91
65%
Scored > 0.563%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

60%
70%
Over 1.572%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

74%
37%
Over 2.541%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

44%
16%
Over 3.519%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

21%
40%
BTTS44%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

49%
9%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

12%
21%
Scored Both Halves15%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

9%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
4343
1.09
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.49
9.40
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

12.05
3.42
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.05
2.37
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.49
69%
Save %65%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

61%
28%
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

23%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
4343
1.53
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

1.61
1.12
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.82
0.41
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

-0.21
-0.28
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.34
0.13
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.13

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
4343
11.21
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.14
3.95
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

3.70
6.60
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

7.33
59%
Box Shot %60%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

60%
35%
On-Target %33%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

30%
10%
Shot Conversion9%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

7%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
4343
47%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

51%
68%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

68%
334.21
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

373.98
-0.10
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

0.06

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
4343
37%16/43
Leading at HT28%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

19%8/43
37%16/43
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

51%22/43
26%11/43
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

30%13/43
56%24/43
HT/FT Same Outcome53%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

51%22/43
63%10/16
Led at HT → Won63%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

63%5/8
18%2/11
Trailed at HT → Recovered24%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

31%4/13

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 43/4343/434343
14%
0-15'14%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

14%
12%
16-30'13%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

14%
18%
31-45'16%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

14%
14%
46-60'15%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

16%
14%
61-75'13%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

12%
28%
76-90+'29%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

30%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 43/4343/434343
50%21/42
Scored First45%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

39%15/38
50%21/42
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

61%23/38
62%13/21
Win when Scoring First58%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

53%8/15
10%2/21
Win when Conceding First9%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

9%2/23
33'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

25'
35'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

36'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 43/4343/434343
23%10/43
Scored after 75'23%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

23%10/43
40%17/43
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

35%15/43
67%14/21
Lead Saved after 75'68%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

69%9/13
33%7/21
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

31%4/13
21%9/43
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

14%6/43

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 43/4343/434343
94%47/50
Open-Play Share89%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

84%36/43
2%1/50
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

9%4/43
4%2/50
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

7%3/43
9%4/46
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

8%5/61
2%1/46
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/61

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
4343
5.00
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.35
4.74
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

3.65
51%
Corner Share55%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

59%
-0.07
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

1.92
65%28/43
Match Corners > 8.557%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

49%21/43
51%22/43
Match Corners > 9.547%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

42%18/43
42%18/43
Match Corners > 10.534%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

26%11/43

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 43/4343/434343
1.74
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

2.26
2%1/43
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

12%5/43
10.16
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.51
72%26/36
Match Cards > 3.578%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

83%30/36
36/4336/43
56%20/36
Match Cards > 4.557%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

58%21/36
36/4336/43
67%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeBarrow at home · Tranmere on the road
2121
1.67
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

0.67
48%10/21
Win Rate31%

Share of sampled matches won.

14%3/21
29%6/21
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

62%13/21
1.48
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

0.81
0.90
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

2.00
38%8/21
Clean Sheet26%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

14%3/21
43%9/21
BTTS48%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

52%11/21
38%8/21
Over 2.548%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

57%12/21
1.66
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.32
1.07
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

2.39