League Two·
Regular Season - 24·01/02/2025·14:45
Gillingham
Gillingham
LLDWW
0-3
Finished
HT0-2
Bromley
Bromley
DWWDW
📍 Priestfield Stadium, Gillingham, Kent
Season statsLeague Two
Gillingham22matchesBromley22matches

Every panel below reflects each team's matches in League Two.

Coverage varies by leaguetop-tier competitions have richer per-match data; lower divisions and smaller leagues track fewer metrics, so some panels may be sparse or missing entirely.
Pre-match snapshotevery value reflects each team's state going into kick-off — frozen before the match starts, not updated live.

Overall

Overallteam-strength snapshot
39%
Overall

Composite team strength — average of LTQ and Hype.

75%
1375
ELO

Chess-style strength rating going into kick-off.

1547
43%
LTQ

Long-term quality across all competitions.

67%
35%
Hype

Short-term fixture buzz / excitement signal.

82%
1.99
Momentum

Recent goal-scoring trend (weighted goals signal).

2.84

Match Outcome

Match Outcomeresults breakdown
2222
1.36
Points per Game

Average points per match across the sampled games (max 3).

1.41
41%
Win Rate

Share of sampled matches won.

32%
14%
Draw Rate

Share of sampled matches that ended level.

45%
45%
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

23%
41%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%
32%
Failed to Score

Share of matches where the team didn't score (lower is better).

14%

Goal Scoring

Goal Scoringattacking output
2222
1.00
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.41
68%
Scored > 0.577%

Share of matches where the team scored at least once.

86%
55%
Over 1.568%

Share of matches with total goals > 1.5.

82%
32%
Over 2.536%

Share of matches with total goals > 2.5.

41%
9%
Over 3.516%

Share of matches with total goals > 3.5 — high-scoring affairs.

23%
32%
BTTS50%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

68%
5%
BTTS & Win

Share of matches won while both teams scored — strong attack with a defensive lapse.

14%
14%
Scored Both Halves18%

Share of matches with a goal in both the 1st and 2nd half.

23%

Defensive Solidity

Defensive Soliditygoals & shots conceded
2222
0.95
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

1.18
10.73
Avg Shots Conceded

Total shots faced per match — defensive pressure (> 17.5/match is heavy siege).

13.68
3.32
Avg SoT Conceded

Shots on target faced per match — quality of chances given up (> 5.5 is severe).

4.05
2.43
Avg Saves

Goalkeeper saves per match (> 4.5 means the keeper is doing heavy lifting).

2.73
21/22
70%
Save %69%

Share of opponent shots on target stopped by the keeper.

67%
41%
Clean Sheet34%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

27%

xG Trends

xG TrendsEWMA-smoothed performance
2222
1.01
EWMAxG For

Smoothed expected goals created per match — top attacks hit > 2.5/match, mid-table sits around 1.4.

2.06
1.51
EWMAxG Against

Smoothed expected goals conceded per match — elite defenses < 1.0, struggling sides > 2.0.

1.40
-0.50
EWMAxG Diff

Net xG: attack minus defense. ±1 is dominant/poor; ±2 is title-contender or crisis-level.

0.66
-0.13
EWMAFinishing Edge

Goals scored minus xG. +0.3 is clinical, −0.3 is wasteful; ±1 is statistical outlier.

-0.39
0.10
EWMAxG per Shot

Average chance quality per attempt — 0.10 is mid, 0.15+ means the team only shoots from dangerous spots.

0.17

Shots Quality

Shots Qualityvolume & accuracy
2222
10.36
Avg Shots

Total shots per match — pure attacking volume (> 16.5/match is elite).

12.45
3.14
Avg Shots on Target

Shots on target per match — strikes the keeper had to handle (> 5.5/match is heavy).

4.05
6.91
Avg Shots in Box

Shots taken from inside the penalty area — proximity to goal (> 8.5/match means consistent box presence).

8.27
67%
Box Shot %67%

Share of shots taken from inside the box — chance-selection quality. Mid sits ~60%, elite > 75%.

66%
30%
On-Target %31%

Share of shots that hit the target — striking accuracy. Mid ~33%, elite > 40%.

32%
10%
Shot Conversion10%

Goals per shot taken — clinical efficiency. ~10% is league average, > 15% is elite finishing.

11%

Possession & Passing

Possession & Passingball control
2222
49%
Avg Possession

Share of match time with the ball. > 55% is dominant, < 40% is reactive.

40%
69%
Pass Accuracy

Share of passes completed — distribution quality. Mid sits ~80%, elite > 88%.

62%
357.14
Avg Passes

Total passes attempted per match — distribution volume. Top sides > 550, bottom sides < 400.

258.05
-0.00
EWMAPossession Trend

Smoothed possession differential — team minus opponent. ±0.1 is normal, ±0.2 is strong dominance.

-0.22

HT / FT Patterns

HT / FT Patternshalf-time vs full-time outcomes
2222
23%5/22
Leading at HT27%

Share of matches the team led at halftime — fast-start signal.

32%7/22
50%11/22
Level at HT

Share of matches level at halftime — balanced or low-tempo openings.

50%11/22
27%6/22
Trailing at HT

Share of matches the team trailed at halftime — slow starts (lower is better).

18%4/22
55%12/22
HT/FT Same Outcome52%

Share of matches where the W/D/L state at halftime matched the full-time result — game-state stability.

50%11/22
80%4/5
Led at HT → Won69%

Of matches led at HT, share converted into a full-time win — closing strength.

57%4/7
0%0/6
Trailed at HT → Recovered38%

Of matches trailing at HT, share rescued to a draw or win — comeback resilience.

75%3/4

Goal Timing

Goal Timingwhen goals happen
events 22/2222/222222
14%
0-15'15%

Hot starts — share of the team's goals scored in the opening 15 minutes.

16%
14%
16-30'15%

Early control — share scored between the 16th and 30th minute.

16%
5%
31-45'6%

Pre-HT push — share scored in the run-up to halftime.

6%
32%
46-60'26%

Restart wave — share scored in the first 15 minutes after HT.

19%
9%
61-75'14%

Game-state shift — share scored between minutes 61 and 75.

19%
27%
76-90+'25%

Late-game finishers — share scored from the 76th minute onwards (incl. stoppage time).

23%

First-Goal Edge

First-Goal Edgewho strikes first
events 22/2222/222222
67%14/21
Scored First66%

Share of matches where the team opened the scoring — fast-start signal.

65%13/20
33%7/21
Conceded First

Share of matches where the team conceded the opening goal (lower is better).

35%7/20
64%9/14
Win when Scoring First59%

Of matches the team scored first, share converted into a win — closing strength after the opener.

54%7/13
0%0/7
Win when Conceding First0%

Of matches conceding first, share rescued into a win — comeback strength.

0%0/7
38'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Scored

Average minute of the team's first goal — earlier means faster starters.

30'
28'
Avg Min. 1st Goal Conceded

Average minute of the first goal conceded — later is better (defense holds longer).

37'

Late-Game Strength

Late-Game Strengthafter the 75th minute
events 22/2222/222222
18%4/22
Scored after 75'25%

Share of matches with a late goal scored by the team — late finishers signal.

32%7/22
14%3/22
Conceded after 75'

Share of matches the team conceded a late goal — late-game vulnerability (lower is better).

32%7/22
88%7/8
Lead Saved after 75'83%

Of matches leading at 75', share closed out for a win — closing strength.

78%7/9
13%1/8
Lead Lost after 75'

Of matches leading at 75', share dropped to a draw or loss — late-game collapse risk.

22%2/9
9%2/22
Any Goal in Stoppage Time

Share of matches with any goal in stoppage time (90+) — late-drama frequency.

27%6/22

Set Pieces

Set Piecespenalty / own-goal share
events 22/2222/222222
100%22/22
Open-Play Share94%

Of the team's scored goals, share from open play — non-set-piece scoring quality.

87%27/31
0%0/22
Penalty Share

Of the team's scored goals, share from penalty kicks — penalty dependency.

13%4/31
0%0/22
Opp Own-Goal Bonus

Of the team's scored goals, share that were opponent own-goals — pressure / fortune.

0%0/31
0%0/21
Penalty Conceded Share

Of conceded goals, share from opponent penalties — defensive discipline (lower is better).

12%3/26
0%0/21
Own-Goal Cost

Of conceded goals, share that were the team's own goals — pressure-induced errors (lower is better).

0%0/26

Corners

Cornersset-piece pressure
2222
4.23
Avg Corners For

Average corners won per match — attacking territorial pressure (> 5.5 is heavy).

5.09
3.91
Avg Corners Against

Average corners conceded per match — territorial pressure faced (lower is better).

5.00
52%
Corner Share51%

Share of total corners in the team's matches that went to the team — territorial dominance ratio.

50%
0.74
EWMACorners Diff

Smoothed corner differential per match — long-term territorial advantage (±2 is strong).

0.65
36%8/22
Match Corners > 8.548%

Share of matches with total corners > 8.5 (Over 8.5 line) — high-tempo encounter signal.

59%13/22
27%6/22
Match Corners > 9.541%

Share of matches with total corners > 9.5 (Over 9.5 line).

55%12/22
18%4/22
Match Corners > 10.530%

Share of matches with total corners > 10.5 (Over 10.5 line) — corner-heavy clashes only.

41%9/22

Cards & Discipline

Cards & Disciplineyellows, reds & fouls
events 22/2222/222222
2.32
Avg Yellow Cards

Yellow cards picked up per match — discipline signal (lower is better).

1.68
9%2/22
Red Card Match Rate

Share of matches with at least one red card to the team — sending-off risk.

18%4/22
12.45
Avg Fouls

Fouls committed per match — aggression / tactical-foul tendency (lower is calmer).

11.05
78%14/18
Match Cards > 3.567%

Share of matches with total card points (both teams, yellow=1 / red=2, 2Y→R counted as 2) > 3.5 — Over 3.5 line.

56%10/18
18/2218/22
50%9/18
Match Cards > 4.547%

Share of matches with total card points > 4.5 — Over 4.5 line.

44%8/18
18/2218/22
68%
Cards in 2nd Half

Share of card events that occur after halftime — late-discipline tendency.

65%

Venue Edge

Venue EdgeGillingham at home · Bromley on the road
1110
1.73
PPG at Venue

Points per match at the venue — home team at home, away team away.

1.60
55%6/11
Win Rate47%

Share of sampled matches won.

40%4/10
36%4/11
Loss Rate

Share of sampled matches lost (lower is better).

20%2/10
1.45
Avg Goals Scored

Goals scored per match across the sampled games.

1.20
0.91
Avg Goals Conceded

Goals conceded per match (lower is better).

0.90
45%5/11
Clean Sheet43%

Share of matches with no goals conceded.

40%4/10
36%4/11
BTTS43%

Share of matches where both teams scored.

50%5/10
45%5/11
Over 2.538%

Share of venue matches with total goals > 2.5.

30%3/10
1.43
EWMAAttack xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG created at venue — long-term attacking strength in this fixture's venue context.

1.83
1.42
EWMADefense xG (EWMA)

Smoothed xG conceded at venue — defensive strength in this fixture's venue context (lower is better).

1.22